/* * [The "BSD license"] * Copyright (c) 2010 Terence Parr * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products * derived from this software without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR * IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. * IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, * INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT * NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF * THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ package org.antlr.test; import org.antlr.analysis.DFA; import org.antlr.analysis.DecisionProbe; import org.antlr.codegen.CodeGenerator; import org.antlr.misc.BitSet; import org.antlr.runtime.Token; import org.antlr.tool.*; import org.junit.Test; import java.util.List; import java.util.Map; import java.util.Set; public class TestSemanticPredicates extends BaseTest { /** Public default constructor used by TestRig */ public TestSemanticPredicates() { } @Test public void testPredsButSyntaxResolves() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A | {p2}? B ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->:s1=>1\n" + ".s0-B->:s2=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLL_1_Pred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A | {p2}? A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLL_1_Pred_forced_k_1() throws Exception { // should stop just like before w/o k set. Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a options {k=1;} : {p1}? A | {p2}? A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLL_2_Pred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A B | {p2}? A B ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-B->.s2\n" + ".s2-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{p2}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testPredicatedLoop() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : ( {p1}? A | {p2}? A )+;"); String expecting = // loop back ".s0-A->.s2\n" + ".s0-EOF->:s1=>3\n" + ".s2-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{p2}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testPredicatedToStayInLoop() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : ( {p1}? A )+ (A)+;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{true}?->:s3=>2\n"; // loop back checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testAndPredicates() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? {p1a}? A | {p2}? A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{(p1&&p1a)}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testOrPredicates() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | {p2}? A ;\n" + "b : {p1}? A | {p1a}? A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{(p1a||p1)}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testIgnoresHoistingDepthGreaterThanZero() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : A {p1}? | A {p2}?;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->:s1=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "A", null, null, 2, false); } @Test public void testIgnoresPredsHiddenByActions() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {a1} {p1}? A | {a2} {p2}? A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->:s1=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "A", null, null, 2, true); } @Test public void testIgnoresPredsHiddenByActionsOneAlt() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A | {a2} {p2}? A ;"); // ok since 1 pred visible String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{true}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, true); } /* @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContextk2() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : b | A B;\n" + "b : {p1}? A B | A B ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "A B", new int[] {1}, null, 3); } */ @Test public void testHoist2() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | c ;\n" + "b : {p1}? A ;\n" + "c : {p2}? A ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testHoistCorrectContext() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | {p2}? ID ;\n" + "b : {p1}? ID | INT ;\n"); String expecting = // only tests after ID, not INT :) ".s0-ID->.s1\n" + ".s0-INT->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testDefaultPredNakedAltIsLast() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | ID ;\n" + "b : {p1}? ID | INT ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-ID->.s1\n" + ".s0-INT->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{true}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testDefaultPredNakedAltNotLast() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : ID | b ;\n" + "b : {p1}? ID | INT ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-ID->.s1\n" + ".s0-INT->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{!(p1)}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLeftRecursivePred() throws Exception { // No analysis possible. but probably good to fail. Not sure we really want // left-recursion even if guarded with pred. Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "s : a ;\n" + "a : {p1}? a | ID ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-ID->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{true}?->:s3=>2\n"; DecisionProbe.verbose=true; // make sure we get all error info ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); CodeGenerator generator = new CodeGenerator(newTool(), g, "Java"); g.setCodeGenerator(generator); if ( g.getNumberOfDecisions()==0 ) { g.buildNFA(); g.createLookaheadDFAs(false); } DFA dfa = g.getLookaheadDFA(1); assertEquals(null, dfa); // can't analyze. /* String result = serializer.serialize(dfa.startState); assertEquals(expecting, result); */ assertEquals("unexpected number of expected problems", 1, equeue.size()); Message msg = (Message)equeue.errors.get(0); assertTrue("warning must be a left recursion msg", msg instanceof LeftRecursionCyclesMessage); } @Test public void testIgnorePredFromLL2AltLastAltIsDefaultTrue() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A B | A C | {p2}? A | {p3}? A | A ;\n"); // two situations of note: // 1. A B syntax is enough to predict that alt, so p1 is not used // to distinguish it from alts 2..5 // 2. Alts 3, 4, 5 are nondeterministic with upon A. p2, p3 and the // complement of p2||p3 is sufficient to resolve the conflict. Do // not include alt 1's p1 pred in the "complement of other alts" // because it is not considered nondeterministic with alts 3..5 String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-C->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s4=>3\n" + ".s1-{p3}?->:s5=>4\n" + ".s1-{true}?->:s6=>5\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testIgnorePredFromLL2AltPredUnionNeeded() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A B | A C | {p2}? A | A | {p3}? A ;\n"); // two situations of note: // 1. A B syntax is enough to predict that alt, so p1 is not used // to distinguish it from alts 2..5 // 2. Alts 3, 4, 5 are nondeterministic with upon A. p2, p3 and the // complement of p2||p3 is sufficient to resolve the conflict. Do // not include alt 1's p1 pred in the "complement of other alts" // because it is not considered nondeterministic with alts 3..5 String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-C->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{!((p3||p2))}?->:s5=>4\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s4=>3\n" + ".s1-{p3}?->:s6=>5\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testPredGets2SymbolSyntacticContext() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | A B | C ;\n" + "b : {p1}? A B ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s0-C->:s5=>3\n" + ".s1-B->.s2\n" + ".s2-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{true}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testMatchesLongestThenTestPred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "a : b | c ;\n" + "b : {p}? A ;\n" + "c : {q}? (A|B)+ ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s0-B->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{p}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{q}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testPredsUsedAfterRecursionOverflow() throws Exception { // analysis must bail out due to non-LL(*) nature (ovf) // retries with k=1 (but with LL(*) algorithm not optimized version // as it has preds) Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar P;\n"+ "s : {p1}? e '.' | {p2}? e ':' ;\n" + "e : '(' e ')' | INT ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-'('->.s1\n" + ".s0-INT->.s4\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n" + ".s4-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s4-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; DecisionProbe.verbose=true; // make sure we get all error info ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); CodeGenerator generator = new CodeGenerator(newTool(), g, "Java"); g.setCodeGenerator(generator); if ( g.getNumberOfDecisions()==0 ) { g.buildNFA(); g.createLookaheadDFAs(false); } assertEquals("unexpected number of expected problems", 0, equeue.size()); checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testPredsUsedAfterK2FailsNoRecursionOverflow() throws Exception { // analysis must bail out due to non-LL(*) nature (ovf) // retries with k=1 (but with LL(*) algorithm not optimized version // as it has preds) Grammar g = new Grammar( "grammar P;\n" + "options {k=2;}\n"+ "s : {p1}? e '.' | {p2}? e ':' ;\n" + "e : '(' e ')' | INT ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-'('->.s1\n" + ".s0-INT->.s6\n" + ".s1-'('->.s2\n" + ".s1-INT->.s5\n" + ".s2-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{p2}?->:s4=>2\n" + ".s5-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s5-{p2}?->:s4=>2\n" + ".s6-'.'->:s3=>1\n" + ".s6-':'->:s4=>2\n"; DecisionProbe.verbose=true; // make sure we get all error info ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); CodeGenerator generator = new CodeGenerator(newTool(), g, "Java"); g.setCodeGenerator(generator); if ( g.getNumberOfDecisions()==0 ) { g.buildNFA(); g.createLookaheadDFAs(false); } assertEquals("unexpected number of expected problems", 0, equeue.size()); checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLexerMatchesLongestThenTestPred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "lexer grammar P;\n"+ "B : {p}? 'a' ;\n" + "C : {q}? ('a'|'b')+ ;"); String expecting = ".s0-'a'->.s1\n" + ".s0-'b'->:s4=>2\n" + ".s1-'a'..'b'->:s4=>2\n" + ".s1-->.s2\n" + ".s2-{p}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{q}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 2, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testLexerMatchesLongestMinusPred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "lexer grammar P;\n"+ "B : 'a' ;\n" + "C : ('a'|'b')+ ;"); String expecting = ".s0-'a'->.s1\n" + ".s0-'b'->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-'a'..'b'->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 2, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPred() throws Exception { // gated preds are present on all arcs in predictor Grammar g = new Grammar( "lexer grammar P;\n"+ "B : {p}? => 'a' ;\n" + "C : {q}? => ('a'|'b')+ ;"); String expecting = ".s0-'a'&&{(q||p)}?->.s1\n" + ".s0-'b'&&{q}?->:s4=>2\n" + ".s1-'a'..'b'&&{q}?->:s4=>2\n" + ".s1-&&{(q||p)}?->.s2\n" + ".s2-{p}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{q}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 2, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPredHoistsAndCanBeInStopState() throws Exception { // I found a bug where merging stop states made us throw away // a stop state with a gated pred! Grammar g = new Grammar( "grammar u;\n" + "a : b+ ;\n" + "b : 'x' | {p}?=> 'y' ;"); String expecting = ".s0-'x'->:s2=>1\n" + ".s0-'y'&&{p}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s0-EOF->:s1=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPredInCyclicDFA() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "lexer grammar P;\n"+ "A : {p}?=> ('a')+ 'x' ;\n" + "B : {q}?=> ('a'|'b')+ 'x' ;"); String expecting = ".s0-'a'&&{(q||p)}?->.s1\n" + ".s0-'b'&&{q}?->:s5=>2\n" + ".s1-'a'&&{(q||p)}?->.s1\n" + ".s1-'b'&&{q}?->:s5=>2\n" + ".s1-'x'&&{(q||p)}?->.s2\n" + ".s2-&&{(q||p)}?->.s3\n" + ".s3-{p}?->:s4=>1\n" + ".s3-{q}?->:s5=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 3, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPredNotActuallyUsedOnEdges() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "lexer grammar P;\n"+ "A : ('a' | {p}?=> 'a')\n" + " | 'a' 'b'\n" + " ;"); String expecting1 = ".s0-'a'->.s1\n" + ".s1-{!(p)}?->:s2=>1\n" + // Used to disambig subrule ".s1-{p}?->:s3=>2\n"; // rule A decision can't test p from s0->1 because 'a' is valid // for alt1 *and* alt2 w/o p. Can't test p from s1 to s3 because // we might have passed the first alt of subrule. The same state // is listed in s2 in 2 different configurations: one with and one // w/o p. Can't test therefore. p||true == true. String expecting2 = ".s0-'a'->.s1\n" + ".s1-'b'->:s2=>2\n" + ".s1-->:s3=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting1, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); checkDecision(g, 2, expecting2, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPredDoesNotForceAllToBeGated() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "grammar w;\n" + "a : b | c ;\n" + "b : {p}? B ;\n" + "c : {q}?=> d ;\n" + "d : {r}? C ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-B->:s1=>1\n" + ".s0-C&&{q}?->:s2=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testGatedPredDoesNotForceAllToBeGated2() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "grammar w;\n" + "a : b | c ;\n" + "b : {p}? B ;\n" + "c : {q}?=> d ;\n" + "d : {r}?=> C\n" + " | B\n" + " ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-B->.s1\n" + ".s0-C&&{(q&&r)}?->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{p}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{q}?->:s3=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } @Test public void testORGatedPred() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "grammar w;\n" + "a : b | c ;\n" + "b : {p}? B ;\n" + "c : {q}?=> d ;\n" + "d : {r}?=> C\n" + " | {s}?=> B\n" + " ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-B->.s1\n" + ".s0-C&&{(q&&r)}?->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{(q&&s)}?->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-{p}?->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } /** The following grammar should yield an error that rule 'a' has * insufficient semantic info pulled from 'b'. */ @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContext() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : b | B;\n" + "b : {p1}? B | B ;"); String expecting = ".s0-B->:s1=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "B", new int[] {1}, null, 3, false); } @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContextk2() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : b | A B;\n" + "b : {p1}? A B | A B ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "A B", new int[] {1}, null, 3, false); } @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContextInFOLLOW() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "options {k=1;}\n" + // limit to k=1 because it's LL(2); force pred hoist "a : A? ;\n" + // need FOLLOW "b : X a {p1}? A | Y a A ;"); // only one A is covered String expecting = ".s0-A->:s1=>1\n"; // s0-EOF->s2 branch pruned during optimization checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "A", new int[] {2}, null, 3, false); } @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContextInFOLLOWk2() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : (A B)? ;\n" + // need FOLLOW "b : X a {p1}? A B | Y a A B | Z a ;"); // only first alt is covered String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s0-EOF->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, new int[] {1,2}, "A B", new int[] {2}, null, 2, false); } @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContextInFOLLOWDueToHiddenPred() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : (A B)? ;\n" + // need FOLLOW "b : X a {p1}? A B | Y a {a1} {p2}? A B | Z a ;"); // only first alt is covered String expecting = ".s0-A->.s1\n" + ".s0-EOF->:s3=>2\n" + ".s1-B->:s2=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, new int[] {1,2}, "A B", new int[] {2}, null, 2, true); } /** The following grammar should yield an error that rule 'a' has * insufficient semantic info pulled from 'b'. This is the same * as the previous case except that the D prevents the B path from * "pinching" together into a single NFA state. * * This test also demonstrates that just because B D could predict * alt 1 in rule 'a', it is unnecessary to continue NFA->DFA * conversion to include an edge for D. Alt 1 is the only possible * prediction because we resolve the ambiguity by choosing alt 1. */ @Test public void testIncompleteSemanticHoistedContext2() throws Exception { ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : b | B;\n" + "b : {p1}? B | B D ;"); String expecting = ".s0-B->:s1=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2}, new int[] {1,2}, "B", new int[] {1}, null, 3, false); } @Test public void testTooFewSemanticPredicates() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : {p1}? A | A | A ;"); String expecting = ".s0-A->:s1=>1\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, new int[] {2,3}, new int[] {1,2,3}, "A", null, null, 2, false); } @Test public void testPredWithK1() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "\tlexer grammar TLexer;\n" + "A\n" + "options {\n" + " k=1;\n" + "}\n" + " : {p1}? ('x')+ '.'\n" + " | {p2}? ('x')+ '.'\n" + " ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-'x'->.s1\n" + ".s1-{p1}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{p2}?->:s3=>2\n"; int[] unreachableAlts = null; int[] nonDetAlts = null; String ambigInput = null; int[] insufficientPredAlts = null; int[] danglingAlts = null; int numWarnings = 0; checkDecision(g, 3, expecting, unreachableAlts, nonDetAlts, ambigInput, insufficientPredAlts, danglingAlts, numWarnings, false); } @Test public void testPredWithArbitraryLookahead() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "\tlexer grammar TLexer;\n" + "A : {p1}? ('x')+ '.'\n" + " | {p2}? ('x')+ '.'\n" + " ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-'x'->.s1\n" + ".s1-'.'->.s2\n" + ".s1-'x'->.s1\n" + ".s2-{p1}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{p2}?->:s4=>2\n"; int[] unreachableAlts = null; int[] nonDetAlts = null; String ambigInput = null; int[] insufficientPredAlts = null; int[] danglingAlts = null; int numWarnings = 0; checkDecision(g, 3, expecting, unreachableAlts, nonDetAlts, ambigInput, insufficientPredAlts, danglingAlts, numWarnings, false); } @Test /** For a DFA state with lots of configurations that have the same * predicate, don't just OR them all together as it's a waste to * test a||a||b||a||a etc... ANTLR makes a unique set and THEN * OR's them together. */ public void testUniquePredicateOR() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar v;\n" + "\n" + "a : {a}? b\n" + " | {b}? b\n" + " ;\n" + "\n" + "b : {c}? (X)+ ;\n" + "\n" + "c : a\n" + " | b\n" + " ;\n"); String expecting = ".s0-X->.s1\n" + ".s1-{((a&&c)||(b&&c))}?->:s2=>1\n" + ".s1-{c}?->:s3=>2\n"; int[] unreachableAlts = null; int[] nonDetAlts = null; String ambigInput = null; int[] insufficientPredAlts = null; int[] danglingAlts = null; int numWarnings = 0; checkDecision(g, 3, expecting, unreachableAlts, nonDetAlts, ambigInput, insufficientPredAlts, danglingAlts, numWarnings, false); } @Test public void testSemanticContextPreventsEarlyTerminationOfClosure() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar T;\n" + "a : loop SEMI | ID SEMI\n" + " ;\n" + "loop\n" + " : {while}? ID\n" + " | {do}? ID\n" + " | {for}? ID\n" + " ;"); String expecting = ".s0-ID->.s1\n" + ".s1-SEMI->.s2\n" + ".s2-{(for||do||while)}?->:s3=>1\n" + ".s2-{true}?->:s4=>2\n"; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, null, null, null, null, null, 0, false); } // S U P P O R T public void _template() throws Exception { Grammar g = new Grammar( "parser grammar t;\n"+ "a : A | B;"); String expecting = "\n"; int[] unreachableAlts = null; int[] nonDetAlts = new int[] {1,2}; String ambigInput = "L ID R"; int[] insufficientPredAlts = new int[] {1}; int[] danglingAlts = null; int numWarnings = 1; checkDecision(g, 1, expecting, unreachableAlts, nonDetAlts, ambigInput, insufficientPredAlts, danglingAlts, numWarnings, false); } protected void checkDecision(Grammar g, int decision, String expecting, int[] expectingUnreachableAlts, int[] expectingNonDetAlts, String expectingAmbigInput, int[] expectingInsufficientPredAlts, int[] expectingDanglingAlts, int expectingNumWarnings, boolean hasPredHiddenByAction) throws Exception { DecisionProbe.verbose=true; // make sure we get all error info ErrorQueue equeue = new ErrorQueue(); ErrorManager.setErrorListener(equeue); CodeGenerator generator = new CodeGenerator(newTool(), g, "Java"); g.setCodeGenerator(generator); // mimic actions of org.antlr.Tool first time for grammar g if ( g.getNumberOfDecisions()==0 ) { g.buildNFA(); g.createLookaheadDFAs(false); } if ( equeue.size()!=expectingNumWarnings ) { System.err.println("Warnings issued: "+equeue); } assertEquals("unexpected number of expected problems", expectingNumWarnings, equeue.size()); DFA dfa = g.getLookaheadDFA(decision); FASerializer serializer = new FASerializer(g); String result = serializer.serialize(dfa.startState); //System.out.print(result); List unreachableAlts = dfa.getUnreachableAlts(); // make sure unreachable alts are as expected if ( expectingUnreachableAlts!=null ) { BitSet s = new BitSet(); s.addAll(expectingUnreachableAlts); BitSet s2 = new BitSet(); s2.addAll(unreachableAlts); assertEquals("unreachable alts mismatch", s, s2); } else { assertEquals("unreachable alts mismatch", 0, unreachableAlts!=null?unreachableAlts.size():0); } // check conflicting input if ( expectingAmbigInput!=null ) { // first, find nondet message Message msg = getNonDeterminismMessage(equeue.warnings); assertNotNull("no nondeterminism warning?", msg); assertTrue("expecting nondeterminism; found "+msg.getClass().getName(), msg instanceof GrammarNonDeterminismMessage); GrammarNonDeterminismMessage nondetMsg = getNonDeterminismMessage(equeue.warnings); List labels = nondetMsg.probe.getSampleNonDeterministicInputSequence(nondetMsg.problemState); String input = nondetMsg.probe.getInputSequenceDisplay(labels); assertEquals(expectingAmbigInput, input); } // check nondet alts if ( expectingNonDetAlts!=null ) { GrammarNonDeterminismMessage nondetMsg = getNonDeterminismMessage(equeue.warnings); assertNotNull("found no nondet alts; expecting: "+ str(expectingNonDetAlts), nondetMsg); List nonDetAlts = nondetMsg.probe.getNonDeterministicAltsForState(nondetMsg.problemState); // compare nonDetAlts with expectingNonDetAlts BitSet s = new BitSet(); s.addAll(expectingNonDetAlts); BitSet s2 = new BitSet(); s2.addAll(nonDetAlts); assertEquals("nondet alts mismatch", s, s2); assertEquals("mismatch between expected hasPredHiddenByAction", hasPredHiddenByAction, nondetMsg.problemState.dfa.hasPredicateBlockedByAction); } else { // not expecting any nondet alts, make sure there are none GrammarNonDeterminismMessage nondetMsg = getNonDeterminismMessage(equeue.warnings); assertNull("found nondet alts, but expecting none", nondetMsg); } if ( expectingInsufficientPredAlts!=null ) { GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage insuffPredMsg = getGrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage(equeue.warnings); assertNotNull("found no GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage alts; expecting: "+ str(expectingNonDetAlts), insuffPredMsg); Map> locations = insuffPredMsg.altToLocations; Set actualAlts = locations.keySet(); BitSet s = new BitSet(); s.addAll(expectingInsufficientPredAlts); BitSet s2 = new BitSet(); s2.addAll(actualAlts); assertEquals("mismatch between insufficiently covered alts", s, s2); assertEquals("mismatch between expected hasPredHiddenByAction", hasPredHiddenByAction, insuffPredMsg.problemState.dfa.hasPredicateBlockedByAction); } else { // not expecting any nondet alts, make sure there are none GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage nondetMsg = getGrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage(equeue.warnings); if ( nondetMsg!=null ) { System.out.println(equeue.warnings); } assertNull("found insufficiently covered alts, but expecting none", nondetMsg); } assertEquals(expecting, result); } protected GrammarNonDeterminismMessage getNonDeterminismMessage(List warnings) { for (int i = 0; i < warnings.size(); i++) { Message m = (Message) warnings.get(i); if ( m instanceof GrammarNonDeterminismMessage ) { return (GrammarNonDeterminismMessage)m; } } return null; } protected GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage getGrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage(List warnings) { for (int i = 0; i < warnings.size(); i++) { Message m = (Message) warnings.get(i); if ( m instanceof GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage ) { return (GrammarInsufficientPredicatesMessage)m; } } return null; } protected String str(int[] elements) { StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer(); for (int i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) { if ( i>0 ) { buf.append(", "); } int element = elements[i]; buf.append(element); } return buf.toString(); } }