History log of /external/clang/test/Sema/pragma-pack-3.c
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
8e8fb3be5bd78f0564444eca02b404566a5f3b5d 19-Oct-2012 Andy Gibbs <andyg1001@hotmail.co.uk> Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Sema/pragma-pack-3.c
a5728872c7702ddd09537c95bc3cbd20e1f2fb09 15-Dec-2009 Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@91446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Sema/pragma-pack-3.c
1faf5baa2f5e1adecb289679fe41c8a5080e4611 13-May-2009 Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> Add a test case to showcase a difference in #pragma pack handling
compared to gcc. This is worrisome, but I believe we are doing the
"correct" thing, and if I recall correctly I previously verified this
versus MSVC.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Sema/pragma-pack-3.c