History log of /external/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/list/main.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
b36a909eddb26664b1e7c7d1d4fa7295e23bc22a 29-May-2013 Ashok Thirumurthi <ashok.thirumurthi@intel.com> Refactors to provide two variants for evaluation of text_list:
- The original test now passes on Linux with clang because a breakpoint is hit prior to evaluation of text_list, which improves text coverage.
- The new test fails because 4 steps are requested, and only two occur prior to evaluation of text_list.
--- Note that the loss of every second "next" command can be reproduced using lldb manually with this script.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/trunk@182860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/list/main.cpp
66205ce5381ab6db1f9bff83c483a4dc5854afc7 12-Mar-2012 Enrico Granata <egranata@apple.com> Added formatters for libc++ (http://libcxx.llvm.org):
std::string has a summary provider
std::vector std::list and std::map have both a summary and a synthetic children provider
Given the usage of a custom namespace (std::__1::classname) for the implementation of libc++, we keep both libstdcpp and libc++ formatters enabled at the same time since that raises no conflicts and enabled for seamless transition between the two
The formatters for libc++ reside in a libcxx category, and are loaded from libcxx.py (to be found in examples/synthetic)

The formatters-stl test cases have been divided to be separate for libcxx and libstdcpp. This separation is necessary because
(a) we need different compiler flags for libc++ than for libstdcpp
(b) libc++ inlines a lot more than libstdcpp and some code changes were required to accommodate this difference


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/trunk@152570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/list/main.cpp