Cross Reference: /external/valgrind/VEX/priv/ir

Lines Matching refs:GetI
115       * Redundant-GetI removal
133       * If block contains GetI or PutI, Expensive transformations.
136         - Unrolled a loop, and block does not contain GetI or PutI:
139         - Unrolled a loop, and block contains GetI or PutI:
151    accessed using GetI/PutI, and there is no need so far for them to
297             IRExpr_GetI(ex->Iex.GetI.descr,
298                         flatten_Expr(bb, ex->Iex.GetI.ix),
299                         ex->Iex.GetI.bias)));
742                key = mk_key_GetIPutI ( e->Iex.GetI.descr );
1033    Get's, GetI's or Load's, even when accessing the same location, will be
2451          vassert(isIRAtom(ex->Iex.GetI.ix));
2453             ex->Iex.GetI.descr,
2454             subst_Expr(env, ex->Iex.GetI.ix),
2455             ex->Iex.GetI.bias
2942          addUses_Expr(set, e->Iex.GetI.ix);
3220 /* These are helper functions for CSE and GetI/PutI transformations.
3301    /* So now we know that the GetI and PutI index the same array
3479          /* GetI(descr,tmp,bias)*/
3817          if (e->Iex.GetI.ix->tag == Iex_RdTmp) {
3820             ae->u.GetIt.descr = e->Iex.GetI.descr;
3821             ae->u.GetIt.ix    = e->Iex.GetI.ix->Iex.RdTmp.tmp;
3822             ae->u.GetIt.bias  = e->Iex.GetI.bias;
3910          vulnerable kind of bindings are the GetI and Load kinds.
4153       /* Try to collapse 't1 = GetI[t2, con]'. */
4157           && st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.ix->tag == Iex_RdTmp
4158           && collapseChain(bb, i-1, st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.ix
4165          con2 += st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.bias;
4169                  IRExpr_GetI(st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.descr,
4208 /*--- PutI/GetI transformations                               ---*/
4211 /* Given the parts (descr, tmp, bias) for a GetI, scan backwards from
4214    that the PutI writes.  This is the core of PutI-GetI forwarding. */
4257                an area of guest state which is read by a GetI.  Which
4260             /* This Put potentially writes guest state that the GetI
4284                state that the GetI, or not.  So we have to give up. */
4333 /* Assuming pi is a PutI stmt, is s2 a Get/GetI/Put/PutI which might
4403                     s2->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.descr,
4404                     s2->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.ix,
4405                     s2->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.bias
4439 /* ---------- PutI/GetI transformations main functions --------- */
4457           && st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.ix->tag == Iex_RdTmp) {
4458          IRRegArray* descr = st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.descr;
4459          IRExpr*     ix    = st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.ix;
4460          Int         bias  = st->Ist.WrTmp.data->Iex.GetI.bias;
4562          deltaIRExpr(e->Iex.GetI.ix, delta);
5045          IRRegArray *descr = e->Iex.GetI.descr;
5050          setHints_Expr(doesLoad, getInterval, e->Iex.GetI.ix);
5131          aoccCount_Expr(uses, e->Iex.GetI.ix);
5490                    e->Iex.GetI.descr,
5491                    atbSubst_Expr(env, e->Iex.GetI.ix),
5492                    e->Iex.GetI.bias
6438    optimising as much as possible in the presence of GetI and PutI.  */