| 041526f915a90b2b628cd0253e2c85da8040276d |
|
25-Apr-2014 |
Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> |
cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration
The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry and
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macros helpers for iteration over the
cpufreq_frequency_table, so use them.
It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| 7f4b04614a273089ad65654f53771c033fadc65e |
|
28-Mar-2014 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: create another field .flags in cpufreq_frequency_table
Currently cpufreq frequency table has two fields: frequency and driver_data.
driver_data is only for drivers' internal use and cpufreq core shouldn't use
it at all. But with the introduction of BOOST frequencies, this assumption
was broken and we started using it as a flag instead.
There are two problems due to this:
- It is against the description of this field, as driver's data is used by
the core now.
- if drivers fill it with -3 for any frequency, then those frequencies are
never considered by cpufreq core as it is exactly same as value of
CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, i.e. ~2.
The best way to get this fixed is by creating another field flags which
will be used for such flags. This patch does that. Along with that various
drivers need modifications due to the change of struct cpufreq_frequency_table.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| ae6b427132ba39d023e332e7d920e9931ff05313 |
|
03-Dec-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: Mark ARM drivers with CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.
On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment
and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in
frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers.
Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that
will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time.
Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| d4019f0a92ab802f385cc9c8ad3ab7b5449712cb |
|
14-Aug-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.
All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| 9c0ebcf78fde0ffa348a95a544c6d3f2dac5af65 |
|
25-Oct-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:
int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.
So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.
This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:
int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);
CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.
This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.
It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
|
| a307a1e6bc0da1ea1e5960fb386b2bbc3587e808 |
|
03-Oct-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| 0ecc402e0f1f8cc55000c75cb216615d0bee62a6 |
|
03-Oct-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: s3c: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| e96a410540764c21464c22660f7da9d3bfede815 |
|
03-Oct-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: s3cx4xx: Use generic cpufreq routines
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines in the s3cx4xx driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| 4974b8ea4add1ae5e3123fe734deb12859da725b |
|
16-Sep-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: s3cx4xx: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| adc97d6a735dbb1e94cb4f1bf0b55f258b349941 |
|
06-Aug-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: Drop the owner field from struct cpufreq_driver
We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers
as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core.
This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| 166b9addd83aaf6eb22d9db7dc015f81913c9a0e |
|
23-Jun-2013 |
Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> |
cpufreq: s3c2416: fix forgotten driver_data conversions
Commit 5070158804b5 (cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in
cpufreq_frequency_table) renamed the index field to driver_data.
But it seems some uses in the s3c2416 driver were forgotten.
So convert the last index users to read driver_data.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
| 278cee0515a3b3abb0d4e614d969b5be35c2c288 |
|
31-May-2013 |
Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> |
treewide: Fix typo in printk
Correct spelling typo in printk within various drivers.
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| 5070158804b5339c71809f5e673cea1cfacd804d |
|
30-Mar-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_table
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an
index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful
for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes.
Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the
assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake.
Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its
users are updated accordingly.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| b43a7ffbf33be7e4d3b10b7714ee663ea2c52fe2 |
|
24-Mar-2013 |
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()
policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And
their frequencies are always updated together.
Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but
the best place for this code is in cpufreq core.
This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for
all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| c03c3013747a4c9e01d1b48637e6dd0ea3ef65c1 |
|
18-Jul-2012 |
Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> |
cpufreq: Fix typo in cpufreq driver
Correct spelling typo in cpufreq driver.
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| 34ee55075265d68ca858f2426e165733664385b4 |
|
16-Feb-2012 |
Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> |
[CPUFREQ] Add S3C2416/S3C2450 cpufreq driver
The S3C2416/S3C2450 SoCs support two sources for the armclk.
The first source is the so called armdiv which divides the msysclk down
to provide necessary cpu rates. In this mode the core voltage must be
always at 1.3V. The frequency from the armdiv is not allowed to be
lower than the hclk frequency.
In the second mode the armclk can be sourced directly from the hclk in
the so called "dynamic voltags scaling" (dvs) mode. Here the armdiv
isn't used at all. Also in this mode the core voltage may be lowered.
Existing hardware and tests with it suggest 1.0V as sufficient.
When changing the clock source to the armdiv from the hclk, the SoC
shows stability issues if the new frequency is higher than the current
hclk frequency. Hence the driver always forces the armdiv to the hclk
frequency before the source change and lets the cpufreq issue another
set_target call for higher frequencies.
To mark the hclk frequency as lower as the corresponding armdiv
frequency it is set 1MHz below the real frequency. This lets the cpufreq
framework change between 133MHz based on hclk and 133MHz based on armdiv
at will.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Andrey Gusakov <dron0gus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|