| e17b445b6c813f6f9bc93a5e3811128a197ef50b |
|
10-Jan-2018 |
Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> |
Reduce pss collection amount, improve logging.
Tuned rates that we collect PSS, to reduce how much we do
that heavy operation. Added a new way to determine
whether a process has changed to a state for the
"first" time -- now this is when it has gone to that
state for the first time since it was in a lower state.
This will reduce the amount of time we consider a
process to be first to only when it has previously
gone into a higher state than it had before.
Keep track of more fine-grained information about why we
collect a PSS sample (not just internal, but for a single
process, all processes because of a mem state change, all
processes because of a poll).
Started collecting RSS in various places, so we can start
looking at that w.r.t. PSS and see about transitioning to
it is a new primary metric.
Added logging for many of the places where the system
writes its configuration files, so we can more easily
see any bad behavior going on in those areas.
Added some currently disabled code to read smaps directly
instead of using fgets(). Probably won't help, but want
tot test.
Bug: 70859548
Test: atest CtsAppTestCases
Change-Id: I400dba0f3ae9c024df51c946cfa592561028b598
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 616541d7016ee4440051738a8f0c7c3b7086d375 |
|
26-Jul-2017 |
Christopher Tate <ctate@google.com> |
Persisted jobs versus incorrect boot-time RTC
Devices routinely boot in a state where the RTC is wildly incorrect
in the past (2009, 1999, or even at Unix epoch zero). When we have
persistent jobs to be scheduled at boot, this presents a problem: when
should those jobs run, given that our idea of "now" is incorrect?
The previous implementation fell back to rescheduling these jobs
"from scratch" in this situation, as though they were newly-introduced,
but this turns out to have some emergent pathologies when the jobs
were intended to become runnable after long initial delays: the
rescheduling behavior could wind up starving jobs out entirely,
never running them regardless of how much real uptime the device
had, given the "wrong" pattern of reboots.
We now preserve the original nominal schedule, but recognize when we
have booted in a pathological situation, and correct the schedule for
these jobs when the system clock becomes sensible.
Bug 63817592
Test: JobScheduler test suite plus manual bogus-boot-time repro
Change-Id: Ia36fc5298b68db74e4e07e973b68e68e66206b43
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 74bf71b23c5deca47166d6627361f26ee5d62a7c |
|
20-Jul-2017 |
Amith Yamasani <yamasani@google.com> |
Handle an edge case that can reset settings provider data
If the AtomicFile does the rename and fails when writing the
original, make sure we can at least use the backup on reboot.
Bug: 63753300
Test: Stop shell, move settings_global.xml to backup, start shell.
Change-Id: I2049b48af05161bb2c68717a71c1700a95150a6c
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 47aafbe033202ccc2c0ea9af2b0f1596ebed4373 |
|
13-Feb-2017 |
Eugene Susla <eugenesusla@google.com> |
Record app<->device association to xml file
Bug: 30932767
Test: Ensure file not exists -> query associations -> ensure result is empty list
Associate device -> cat xml file -> ensure record appears as extected
Disassociate device -> cat xml file -> ensure record is no longer present
Change-Id: Ibe456a6d9292e05e2391f5138e43fdaa37f87e1b
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 683914bfb13908bf380a25258cd45bcf43f13dc9 |
|
15-Jan-2015 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Rewrite of the settings provider.
This change modifies how global, secure, and system settings are
managed. In particular, we are moving away from the database to
an in-memory model where the settings are persisted asynchronously
to XML.
This simplifies evolution and improves performance, for example,
changing a setting is down from around 400 ms to 10 ms as we do not
hit the disk. The trade off is that we may lose data if the system
dies before persisting the change.
In practice this is not a problem because 1) this is very rare;
2) apps changing a setting use the setting itself to know if it
changed, so next time the app runs (after a reboot that lost data)
the app will be oblivious that data was lost.
When persisting the settings we delay the write a bit to batch
multiple changes. If a change occurs we reschedule the write
but when a maximal delay occurs after the first non-persisted
change we write to disk no matter what. This prevents a malicious
app poking the settings all the time to prevent them being persisted.
The settings are persisted in separate XML files for each type of
setting per user. Specifically, they are in the user's system
directory and the files are named: settings_type_of_settings.xml.
Data migration is performed after the data base is upgraded to its
last version after which the global, system, and secure tables are
dropped.
The global, secure, and system settings now have the same version
and are upgraded as a whole per user to allow migration of settings
between these them. The upgrade steps should be added to the
SettingsProvider.UpgradeController and not in the DatabaseHelper.
Setting states are mapped to an integer key derived from the user
id and the setting type. Therefore, all setting states are in
a lookup table which makes all opertions very fast.
The code is a complete rewrite aiming for improved clarity and
increased maintainability as opposed to using minor optimizations.
Now setting and getting the changed setting takes around 10 ms. We
can optimize later if needed.
Now the code path through the call API and the one through the
content provider APIs end up being the same which fixes bugs where
some enterprise cases were not implemented in the content provider
code path.
Note that we are keeping the call code path as it is a bit faster
than the provider APIs with about 2 ms for setting and getting
a setting. The front-end settings APIs use the call method.
Further, we are restricting apps writing to the system settings.
If the app is targeting API higher than Lollipop MR1 we do not
let them have their settings in the system ones. Otherwise, we
warn that this will become an error. System apps like GMS core
can change anything like the system or shell or root.
Since old apps can add their settings, this can increase the
system memory footprint with no limit. Therefore, we limit the
amount of settings data an app can write to the system settings
before starting to reject new data.
Another problem with the system settings was that an app with a
permission to write there can put invalid values for the settings.
We now have validators for these settings that ensure only valid
values are accepted.
Since apps can put their settings in the system table, when the
app is uninstalled this data is stale in the sytem table without
ever being used. Now we keep the package that last changed the
setting and when the package is removed all settings it touched
that are not in the ones defined in the APIs are dropped.
Keeping in memory settings means that we cannot handle arbitrary
SQL operations, rather the supported operations are on a single
setting by name and all settings (querying). This should not be
a problem in practice but we have to verify it. For that reason,
we log unsupported SQL operations to the event log to do some
crunching and see what if any cases we should additionally support.
There are also tests for the settings provider in this change.
Change-Id: I941dc6e567588d9812905b147dbe1a3191c8dd68
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 0debc9aff4c0cbc28e083a948081d91b0f171319 |
|
17-Jul-2014 |
Adam Lesinski <adamlesinski@google.com> |
First iteration of a public UsageStats API
UsageStats API that allows apps to get a list of packages that have been
recently used, along with basic stats like how long they have been in
the foreground and the most recent time they were running.
Bug: 15165667
Change-Id: I2a2d1ff69bd0b5703ac3d9de1780df42ad90d439
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|
| 39606a007a5b1309dd000234f2b8cf156c49fd0f |
|
01-Aug-2012 |
Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> |
Make AtomicFile a public API. It's about time!
Change-Id: Ib34e294747405b7ab709cb0bbb2d9a0cc80ce86a
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/util/AtomicFile.java
|