| ac3da004fe02e855e2444ce76abf13f12e2e0050 |
|
07-Jun-2012 |
Mattias Petersson <mattias.petersson@sonymobile.com> |
Missing zero-checks in JIT compiler
Zero-checks were not generated by the JIT compiler for
some instructions. This caused crashes instead of
the expected ArithmeticException.
Change-Id: Ic8041741a7cccc1bd6b8c3c0723ba55a55af856b
|
| 232c385b9ece322d677a48947ab1e052c1e2427c |
|
18-Jan-2012 |
Ben Cheng <bccheng@google.com> |
Bug fix for control-flow construction involving nested loops.
Bug: 5884080
Change-Id: Ic2f42abae3e71f9c0729984902396f92902184a3
|
| f36ff048fa354bcc7597a187002728106a8b9346 |
|
18-Jan-2012 |
Ben Cheng <bccheng@google.com> |
Bug fix for control-flow construction involving nested loops.
Bug: 5884080
Change-Id: Ic2f42abae3e71f9c0729984902396f92902184a3
|
| 60a6fa031b0e84b508b9795bc826a121e34d5e33 |
|
12-Mar-2010 |
Ben Cheng <bccheng@android.com> |
Add a JIT unit test for ArrayStoreException in APUT_OBJECT.
Bug: 2487514
tests> ./run-test --fast 083-jit-regressions
/home/bccheng/local/master-git/dalvik/tests/083-jit-regressions: running...
/home/bccheng/local/master-git/dalvik/tests/083-jit-regressions: succeeded!
tests> ./run-test --jit 083-jit-regressions
/home/bccheng/local/master-git/dalvik/tests/083-jit-regressions: running...
/home/bccheng/local/master-git/dalvik/tests/083-jit-regressions: FAILED!
--- expected.txt 2010-03-12 13:45:13.000000000 -0800
+++ output.txt 2010-03-12 14:51:38.000000000 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
b2296099 passes
b2302318 passes
-b2487514 passes
+b2487514 fails: catchCount is 17 (expecting 1000)
Change-Id: I6651a3e0945f96bbb9e0c0af13f2c322b82d0cb0
|
| 11aa1bb56f84e83d49a4b9e7b2cb90fd9ab094b0 |
|
11-Dec-2009 |
Bill Buzbee <buzbee@google.com> |
Jit: Fix 083-jit-regressions test to omit non-deterministic output
|
| 2ce8a6c8c11432338cf0cbca8f462e2cf7da1843 |
|
04-Dec-2009 |
Bill Buzbee <buzbee@google.com> |
Jit: Fix for [Issue 2302318] Crash during spin-on-suspend testing
This was an amusing bug: the test case simulated a daemon by falling
into an empty loop-forever. The trace selector treats unconditional
branches as NOPs, and proceeded to repeatedly add the same "branch to self"
instruction to the trace until it reached max trace size. The compiler
got confused, and died.
|
| 0e605279abe713cb54cac3b8eec90d674b6766ce |
|
01-Dec-2009 |
Bill Buzbee <buzbee@google.com> |
Jit: shift bug fix - 2296099
|