1/* Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
2   Written by Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>, 2001.
3
4   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
5   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
6   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
7   any later version.
8
9   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
10   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
11   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
12   GNU General Public License for more details.
13
14   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
15   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
16   Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.  */
17
18#ifndef _STDBOOL_H
19#define _STDBOOL_H
20
21/* ISO C 99 <stdbool.h> for platforms that lack it.  */
22
23/* Usage suggestions:
24
25   Programs that use <stdbool.h> should be aware of some limitations
26   and standards compliance issues.
27
28   Standards compliance:
29
30       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true'
31         can be used.
32
33       - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1.
34
35       - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false,
36         as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature".
37
38   Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment:
39
40       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used.
41
42       - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro.
43
44       - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are
45         performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted
46         to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'.  This doesn't work
47         with this substitute.  With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1
48         give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'.
49
50   Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool';
51   this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common.  */
52
53
54/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */
55
56/* BeOS <sys/socket.h> already #defines false 0, true 1.  We use the same
57   definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them.  */
58#ifdef __BEOS__
59# include <OS.h> /* defines bool but not _Bool */
60# undef false
61# undef true
62#endif
63
64/* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, we define true and false as
65   enum constants, not only as macros.
66   It is tempting to write
67      typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
68   so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But if we do
69   this, values of type '_Bool' may promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int'
70   (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int'
71   (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)).  So we add a negative value to the
72   enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'.  */
73#if defined __cplusplus || defined __BEOS__
74  /* A compiler known to have 'bool'.  */
75  /* If the compiler already has both 'bool' and '_Bool', we can assume they
76     are the same types.  */
77# if !@HAVE__BOOL@
78typedef bool _Bool;
79# endif
80#else
81# if !defined __GNUC__
82   /* If @HAVE__BOOL@:
83        Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when
84        the built-in _Bool type is used.  See
85          http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html
86          http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html
87          http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html
88        Similar bugs are likely with other compilers as well; this file
89        wouldn't be used if <stdbool.h> was working.
90        So we override the _Bool type.
91      If !@HAVE__BOOL@:
92        Need to define _Bool ourselves. As 'signed char' or as an enum type?
93        Use of a typedef, with SunPRO C, leads to a stupid
94          "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99".
95        Use of an enum type, with IRIX cc, leads to a stupid
96          "warning(1185): enumerated type mixed with another type".
97        The only benefit of the enum type, debuggability, is not important
98        with these compilers.  So use 'signed char' and no typedef.  */
99#  define _Bool signed char
100enum { false = 0, true = 1 };
101# else
102   /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it.  */
103#  if !@HAVE__BOOL@
104typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
105#  endif
106# endif
107#endif
108#define bool _Bool
109
110/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives.  */
111#define false 0
112#define true 1
113#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
114
115#endif /* _STDBOOL_H */
116