History log of /external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
651f13cea278ec967336033dd032faef0e9fc2ec 24-Apr-2014 Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com> Updated to Clang 3.5a.

Change-Id: I8127eb568f674c2e72635b639a3295381fe8af82
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
4384712b3a0aedd7c68d6abdb0407850f7b46c8b 20-Jul-2013 Larisse Voufo <lvoufo@google.com> FIXME fix: improving diagnostics for template arguments deduction of class templates and explicit specializations
This patch essentially removes all the FIXMEs following calls to DeduceTemplateArguments() that want to keep track of deduction failure info.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@186730 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
8c5d4078bb40642847164e7613828262d32db973 20-Jul-2013 Larisse Voufo <lvoufo@google.com> Revert "Use function overloading instead of template specialization for diagnosis of bad template argument deductions."

This reverts commit a730f548325756d050d4caaa28fcbffdae8dfe95.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@186729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
a730f548325756d050d4caaa28fcbffdae8dfe95 20-Jul-2013 Larisse Voufo <lvoufo@google.com> Use function overloading instead of template specialization for diagnosis of bad template argument deductions.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@186727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
840462670ba7a6bc26265a2306b35f2f0f01f51c 21-Apr-2013 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
d9bf41893c3a59d5ea33e7b04b0e6211f7dca201 30-Jan-2013 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> [Sema] Constrain test added in r173873 with expected-error-re

Suggested in post-commit review by Richard Smith.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@173880 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
1d87fbaeea4a9fbbd73b3a53641f59f1673098e5 30-Jan-2013 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> Provide a fixit for constexpr non-static data members.

If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.

If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.

(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@173873 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
ff2348888133dcc64f7363af2093cb608caeb7ce 21-Feb-2012 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> Fix a constexpr FIXME: When implicitly instantiating the primary template for an
explicit specialization of a function template, mark the instantiation as
constexpr if the specialization is, rather than requiring them to match.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@151001 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
86c3ae46250cdcc57778c27826060779a92f3815 13-Feb-2012 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> Update constexpr implementation to match CWG's chosen approach for core issues
1358, 1360, 1452 and 1453.
- Instantiations of constexpr functions are always constexpr. This removes the
need for separate declaration/definition checking, which is now gone.
- This makes it possible for a constexpr function to be virtual, if they are
only dependently virtual. Virtual calls to such functions are not constant
expressions.
- Likewise, it's now possible for a literal type to have virtual base classes.
A constexpr constructor for such a type cannot actually produce a constant
expression, though, so add a special-case diagnostic for a constructor call
to such a type rather than trying to evaluate it.
- Classes with trivial default constructors (for which value initialization can
produce a fully-initialized value) are considered literal types.
- Classes with volatile members are not literal types.
- constexpr constructors can be members of non-literal types. We do not yet use
static initialization for global objects constructed in this way.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
6180245e9f63d2927b185ec251fb75aba30f1cac 22-Dec-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> PR11614: Mark defaulted special constructors as constexpr if their implicit
definition would satisfy the constexpr requirements.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@147128 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
1d238ea926bbdd04356ce475934fcd4cac654c4b 21-Dec-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> C++11 half of r147023: In C++11, additionally eagerly instantiate:
- constexpr function template instantiations
- variables of reference type
- constexpr variables


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@147031 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
099e7f647ccda915513f2b2ec53352dc756082d3 19-Dec-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> constexpr handling improvements. Produce detailed diagnostics when a 'constexpr'
variable is initialized by a non-constant expression, and pass in the variable
being declared so that earlier-initialized fields' values can be used.

Rearrange VarDecl init evaluation to make this possible, and in so doing fix a
long-standing issue in our C++ constant expression handling, where we would
mishandle cases like:

extern const int a;
const int n = a;
const int a = 5;
int arr[n];

Here, n is not initialized by a constant expression, so can't be used in an ICE,
even though the initialization expression would be an ICE if it appeared later
in the TU. This requires computing whether the initializer is an ICE eagerly,
and saving that information in PCH files.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@146856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
180f47959a066795cc0f409433023af448bb0328 10-Nov-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> Constant expression evaluation: support for evaluation of structs and unions of
literal types, as well as derived-to-base casts for lvalues and
derived-to-virtual-base casts.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@144265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
66f85713bd0d22f867efa8e9fb0037befdd6b151 07-Nov-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> constexpr: static data members declared constexpr are required to have an
initializer; all other constexpr variables are merely required to be
initialized. In particular, a user-provided constexpr default constructor can be
used for such initialization.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@144028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
0661bd0ccae381613c5967cdf2514255e1f92636 23-Oct-2011 Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk> Attach class template attributes to the templated CXXRecordDecl,
instead of silently discarding them.

As a side effect, this improves diagnostics for constexpr class
templates slightly.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@142755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
762bb9d0ad20320b9f97a841dce57ba5e8e48b07 14-Oct-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> Update all tests other than Driver/std.cpp to use -std=c++11 rather than
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@141900 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
9f569cca2a4c5fb6026005434e27025b9e71309d 01-Oct-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> constexpr: semantic checking for constexpr functions and constructors. Based in
part on patches by Peter Collingbourne.

We diverge from the C++11 standard in a few areas, mostly related to checking
constexpr function declarations, and not just definitions. See WG21 paper
N3308=11-0078 for details.

Function invocation substitution is not available in this patch; constexpr
functions cannot yet be used from within constant expressions.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@140926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
c6d990a767150b02337de1136fdb55ccf349f4d1 29-Sep-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> constexpr: semantic checking for constexpr variables.

We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@140801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
af1fc7af351758b0ea0d285bdfe5640128109a4e 15-Aug-2011 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> Track in the AST whether a function is constexpr.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@137653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp
737801257f795632175517ffce4a80c62fc7bff7 09-Jun-2010 Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> Commit my WIP on constexpr support. This commit: an XFAILed test and treating constexpr as a top-level const.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@105752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.constexpr/p1.cpp