History log of /external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
2fe9b7fb07dff15dd15dd8755a9a9e6de0fe46fc 15-Dec-2011 Richard Trieu <rtrieu@google.com> Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:

// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@146619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
516a6bc399f1f4595423e80c9d4bc687f870acd1 08-Mar-2010 Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> In C++98/03, an uninitialized variable that has POD class type will be
uninitialized. This seems not to be the case in C++0x, where we still
call the (trivial) default constructor for a POD class
(!). Previously, we had implemented only the C++0x rules; now we
implement both. Fixes PR6536.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@97928 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
6d97e5e4b7abdae710c2548b51f4ed0298e86d80 01-Mar-2010 Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> Implement jump checking for initialized c++ variables, implementing
a fixme and PR6451.

Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.

On the testcase in the PR, we produce:

t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto later;
^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
X x;
^



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@97497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
a5728872c7702ddd09537c95bc3cbd20e1f2fb09 15-Dec-2009 Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@91446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
d7d5f0223bd30dfd618762349c6209dd1d5ea3e6 24-Mar-2009 Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> Rename clang to clang-cc.

Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp
e878eb035b343d7d819c092102364ec9849716ae 18-Dec-2008 Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> This is valid in C++.
void foo() { return foo(); }



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61188 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/statements.cpp