| 2ce6eeb8ffc7d3f40b08c84f9670a6fed70f5264 |
|
16-Jan-2013 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
Remove triple from this test, it makes it fail when X86 TTI is missing.
Without a triple opt falls back to NoTTI which comes closer to LSR's pre-TTI behavior.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172609 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2012-07-18-LimitReassociate.ll
|
| e4ba75f43e2ab1480d119d2d4eb878256274e0fb |
|
07-Jan-2013 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Switch the SCEV expander and LoopStrengthReduce to use
TargetTransformInfo rather than TargetLowering, removing one of the
primary instances of the layering violation of Transforms depending
directly on Target.
This is a really big deal because LSR used to be a "special" pass that
could only be tested fully using llc and by looking at the full output
of it. It also couldn't run with any other loop passes because it had to
be created by the backend. No longer is this true. LSR is now just
a normal pass and we should probably lift the creation of LSR out of
lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp and into the PassManagerBuilder. =] I've not done
this, or updated all of the tests to use opt and a triple, because
I suspect someone more familiar with LSR would do a better job. This
change should be essentially without functional impact for normal
compilations, and only change behvaior of targetless compilations.
The conversion required changing all of the LSR code to refer to the TTI
interfaces, which fortunately are very similar to TargetLowering's
interfaces. However, it also allowed us to *always* expect to have some
implementation around. I've pushed that simplification through the pass,
and leveraged it to simplify code somewhat. It required some test
updates for one of two things: either we used to skip some checks
altogether but now we get the default "no" answer for them, or we used
to have no information about the target and now we do have some.
I've also started the process of removing AddrMode, as the TTI interface
doesn't use it any longer. In some cases this simplifies code, and in
others it adds some complexity, but I think it's not a bad tradeoff even
there. Subsequent patches will try to clean this up even further and use
other (more appropriate) abstractions.
Yet again, almost all of the formatting changes brought to you by
clang-format. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2012-07-18-LimitReassociate.ll
|
| a6542923b8ad94d791a12d3d5ae3e62a611f0383 |
|
30-Dec-2012 |
Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr@gmail.com> |
Tests: rewrite 'opt ... %s' to 'opt ... < %s' so that opt does not emit a ModuleID
This is done to avoid odd test failures, like the one fixed in r171243.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2012-07-18-LimitReassociate.ll
|
| 2f3c326786152dbcdc0f3d295a85c3ec448c7438 |
|
18-Jul-2012 |
Andrew Trick <atrick@apple.com> |
Added unit test for PR13361: LSR + SCEV "hangs" on reasonably sized test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160439 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2012-07-18-LimitReassociate.ll
|