History log of /external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
651f13cea278ec967336033dd032faef0e9fc2ec 24-Apr-2014 Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com> Updated to Clang 3.5a.

Change-Id: I8127eb568f674c2e72635b639a3295381fe8af82
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
81557223ba8d7ef8b0468a6e1dc8fc79f2de46f2 25-Sep-2013 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Handle destructors for the argument to C++ 'delete'.

Now that the CFG includes nodes for the destructors in a delete-expression,
process them in the analyzer using the same common destructor interface
currently used for local, member, and base destructors. Also, check for when
the value is known to be null, in which case no destructor is actually run.

This does not yet handle destructors for deleted /arrays/, which may need
more CFG work. It also causes a slight regression in the location of
double delete warnings; the double delete is detected at the destructor
call, which is implicit, and so is reported on the first access within the
destructor instead of at the 'delete' statement. This will be fixed soon.

Patch by Karthik Bhat!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@191381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
8f6134c308951a72642eebb65a44408ea1e237a8 10-Jul-2013 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Remove bogus assert: in C++11, 'new' can do list-initialization.

Previously, we asserted that whenever 'new' did not include a constructor
call, the type must be a non-record type. In C++11, however, uniform
initialization syntax (braces) allow 'new' to construct records with
list-initialization: "new Point{1, 2}".

Removing this assertion should be perfectly safe; the code here matches
what VisitDeclStmt does for regions allocated on the stack.

<rdar://problem/14403437>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@186028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
55e57a50a36749ce0483db2f16259649c9d25792 11-Apr-2013 Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev@gmail.com> [analyzer] Switched to checkPreCall interface for detecting usage after free.

Now the check is also applied to arguments for Objective-C method calls and to 'this' pointer.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
68eb4c25e961d18f82b47a0a385f90d7af09bcc3 06-Apr-2013 Anna Zaks <ganna@apple.com> [analyzer] Shorten the malloc checker’s leak message

As per Ted’s suggestion!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
e6f2bf86288bc45060b21c4f55a6153b8ba80443 30-Mar-2013 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Handle caching out while evaluating a C++ new expression.

Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate
ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously-
reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the
rest of the evaluation.

Caught by the assertion a few lines later.

<rdar://problem/13510065>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178401 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
b061720ddf88b4a1934dbbb1b874a424716cd7d7 27-Mar-2013 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Use evalBind for C++ new of scalar types.

These types will not have a CXXConstructExpr to do the initialization for
them. Previously we just used a simple call to ProgramState::bindLoc, but
that doesn't trigger proper checker callbacks (like pointer escape).

Found by Anton Yartsev.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
2de19edab6001d2c17720d02fe0760b9b452192a 25-Mar-2013 Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev@gmail.com> [analyzer] Adds cplusplus.NewDelete checker that check for memory leaks, double free, and use-after-free problems of memory managed by new/delete.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@177849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
c210cb7a358d14cdd93b58562f33ff5ed2d895c1 27-Aug-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Inline constructors for any object with a trivial destructor.

This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.

We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.

<rdar://problem/11986434>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162681 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
89e5aaf57e20b39e35b0d068ebbc09ae736f2e1e 17-Jul-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Handle new-expressions with initializers for scalars.

<rdar://problem/11818967>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@160328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
70cbf3cc09eb21db1108396d30a414ea66d842cc 03-Jul-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Introduce CXXAllocatorCall to handle placement arg invalidation.

This is NOT full-blown support for operator new, but removes some nasty
duplicated code introduced in r158784.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@159608 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
ee681111c713f300884550b1503713ade3b32374 25-Jun-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Be careful about implicitly-declared operator new/delete. (PR13090)

The implicit global allocation functions do not have valid source locations,
but we still want to treat them as being "system header" functions for the
purposes of how they affect program state.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@159160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
3c4e76d712eac172b100bb10b96637ffca105433 20-Jun-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Move failing 'new' test cases back into new.cpp instead of XFAILing.

Per Anna's comment, this is a better way to handle "to-do list"-type failures.
This way we'll know if any of the features get fixed; in an XFAIL file, /all/
the cases have to be fixed before lit would tell us anything.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@158791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
e38c1c2c449529e60f48e740cb8662e68e5a5330 20-Jun-2012 Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> [analyzer] Invalidate placement args; return the pointer given to placement new

The default global placement new just returns the pointer it is given.
Note that other custom 'new' implementations with placement args are not
guaranteed to do this.

In addition, we need to invalidate placement args, since they may be updated by
the allocator function. (Also, right now we don't properly handle the
constructor inside a CXXNewExpr, so we need to invalidate the placement args
just so that callers know something changed!)

This invalidation is not perfect because CallOrObjCMessage doesn't support
CXXNewExpr, and all of our invalidation callbacks expect that if there's no
CallOrObjCMessage, the invalidation is happening manually (e.g. by a direct
assignment) and shouldn't affect checker-specific metadata (like malloc state);
hence the malloc test case in new-fail.cpp. But region values are now
properly invalidated, at least.

The long-term solution to this problem is to rework CallOrObjCMessage into
something more general, rather than the morass of branches it is today.

<rdar://problem/11679031>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@158784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
2aed8b88613863f3c439cdfb205bdf8b608fb205 16-Feb-2012 Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> Revert "Revert "Make CXXNewExpr contain only a single initialier, and not hold the used constructor itself.""

This reintroduces commit r150682 with a fix for the Bullet benchmark crash.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
1548d14f4092a817f7d90ad3e7a65266dc85fbc5 16-Feb-2012 Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> Revert "Make CXXNewExpr contain only a single initialier, and not hold the used constructor itself."
It leads to a compiler crash in the Bullet benchmark.

This reverts commit r12014.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150684 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
5f688f4b15d02aa7ad159c46b1f78fe59d412f12 16-Feb-2012 Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> Make CXXNewExpr contain only a single initialier, and not hold the used constructor itself.

Holding the constructor directly makes no sense when list-initialized arrays come into play. The constructor is now held in a CXXConstructExpr, if construction is what is done. The new design can also distinguish properly between list-initialization and direct-initialization, as well as implicit default-initialization constructors and explicit value-initialization constructors. Finally, doing it this way removes redundance from the AST because CXXNewExpr doesn't try to handle both the allocation and the initialization responsibilities.

This breaks the static analysis of new expressions. I've filed PR12014 to track this.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150682 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
c4d2c9074be6eb2091086eddd6c8f052f3b245c8 28-Feb-2011 Argyrios Kyrtzidis <akyrtzi@gmail.com> [analyzer] Remove '-analyzer-check-objc-mem' flag, the nominee for best misnomer award.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126676 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
cc05d511b26ac6dc80fcbcc78ac305d2755aa0b9 28-Feb-2011 Argyrios Kyrtzidis <akyrtzi@gmail.com> [analyzer] Migrate UndefBranchChecker to CheckerV2.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
48fb32230541a434ae79064085101d3ea84fb14e 21-Apr-2010 Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing@gmail.com> The second check point in the old test case was invalid.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@101983 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
40ab43b29bff9a240e5281e5952f59ddee623fca 20-Apr-2010 Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing@gmail.com> Add test cases.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@101878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp