History log of /external/clang/test/SemaCXX/for-range-dereference.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
651f13cea278ec967336033dd032faef0e9fc2ec 24-Apr-2014 Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com> Updated to Clang 3.5a.

Change-Id: I8127eb568f674c2e72635b639a3295381fe8af82
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/for-range-dereference.cpp
8b533d97e0683a0c87096b95927a2e9ce02243d4 20-Sep-2012 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> If the range in a for range statement doesn't have a viable begin/end function,
but can be dereferenced to form an expression which does have viable begin/end
functions, then typo-correct the range, even if something else goes wrong with
the statement (such as inaccessible begin/end or the wrong type of loop
variable).

In order to ensure we recover correctly and produce any followup diagnostics in
this case, redo semantic analysis on the for-range statement outside of the
diagnostic trap, after issuing the typo-correction.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164323 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/for-range-dereference.cpp
e1715b66a878bcab315513351e5df68bfc010d2e 21-Aug-2012 Sam Panzer <espanz@gmail.com> Better diagnostics for range-based for loops with bad range types.

The old error message stating that 'begin' was an undeclared identifier
is replaced with a new message explaining that the error is in the range
expression, along with which of the begin() and end() functions was
problematic if relevant.

Additionally, if the range was a pointer type or defines operator*,
attempt to dereference the range, and offer a FixIt if the modified range
works.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/for-range-dereference.cpp