| 261c3ad7fde95748da92550735decc949dc73bf2 |
|
27-Apr-2015 |
joshualitt <joshualitt@chromium.org> |
Change to add zoom animations to nanobench
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1061323003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 1d24b8dfe9aac9cadaf3914b8574a4ff6e9bc19d |
|
27-Mar-2015 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Add matrix constructing helpers to SkMatrix
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1034273002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 9a0f629973ee97ea10f5e3c36a802eca4270d7e0 |
|
20-Mar-2015 |
egdaniel <egdaniel@google.com> |
Only use 256x256 tiles on hd2000 nanobench bots
Initial experiments did show that the 256 tile size fixed the hd2000 win7
nanobot failures. However it did not have any effect on other bots, so this
change is to move back to the larger tile size on all bots expect for the
hd2000.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1022083002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 5d09568a0c67bc54dfb38552d0136b06d3ebf018 |
|
19-Mar-2015 |
egdaniel <egdaniel@google.com> |
Move skp nanobench tile size back to 256x256 to see if it fixes nanobench crashes
Going back to old nanobench tile size to see if the increase to tile is what has been
causing recent nanobench crashes. The crashes seem very nondeterministic and hard to
debug manually.
256x256 is too small of a tile to give accurate gpu results but if this fixes we can try some compromise in the middle
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1022823003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| cc4d6673a942db11a678b572cf0dc5fca2b97f8a |
|
05-Mar-2015 |
bsalomon <bsalomon@google.com> |
Increase default tile sizes in nanobench
R=mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/982863003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 0004e7db42713592fa16a0e6481c95fcf8b398c3 |
|
26-Jan-2015 |
tfarina <tfarina@chromium.org> |
Update references to skiaperf.com.
The new server is being run in perf.skia.org.
BUG=None
R=jcgregorio@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/866943003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| a3e52724ac8b9fa7b48507bff4fa8e558a213e49 |
|
09-Dec-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Switch non-MPD nanobench path to use a separate canvas per tile
It is desirable that, when layer hoisting is disabled, the MPD and non-MPD timings be
roughly the same. Unfortunately, using a separate canvas for each tile (a requirement
for MPD) introduces its own discrepancy into the timing. Using a separate canvas for
each tile doesn't seem to make a difference for 8888 (see the non-MPD 8888 column below)
but slows down GPU rendering (see the non-MPD GPU column below). Since this is how
Chromium renders I propose switching to this regimen (even though it is "slowing down"
GPU rendering).
nanobench mean times (ms) with layer hoisting disabled (for desk_amazon.skp)
8888
MPD non-MPD
1 canvas (old-style) 0.628 1.71
separate (new-style) 0.795 1.63
GPU
MPD non-MPD
1 canvas (old-style) 2.34 1.69
separate (new-style) 2.32 2.66
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/779643002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 63242d7d24917f836eace34ee20faeb49def5e67 |
|
04-Dec-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Fix SKPBench tiling so MPD and non-MPD match
Two issues with the SKPBench tile computation were causing the MPD path to do more work:
The clip from the parent canvas wasn't being used to trim content off the edges of the MPD tiles
The non-MPD path was not taking the scale into account in its tile placement (resulting in it having fewer, larger active tiles when scaling).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/776273002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 186a08ed72749976b533efe7abec062e20c48bda |
|
21-Nov-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Fix memory leak in nanobench
This is cleanup for (Add MultiPictureDraw to nanobench - https://codereview.chromium.org/731973005/)
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/730343003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 5b69377507478623dcf5b11f3ecb010f87c4794f |
|
21-Nov-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Add MultiPictureDraw to nanobench
I would like some guard against performance regressions on our side before turning layer hoisting on in Chromium.
TBR=bsalomon@google.com
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/0ddad31012dabfc1267effc8071d37f7d606efbe
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/731973005
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| e77dadd91ae6f4319c2c047e7e36cc79bb4d1eff |
|
21-Nov-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Revert of Add MultiPictureDraw to nanobench (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/731973005/)
Reason for revert:
Needs more work
Original issue's description:
> Add MultiPictureDraw to nanobench
>
> I would like some guard against performance regressions on our side before turning layer hoisting on in Chromium.
>
> TBR=bsalomon@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/0ddad31012dabfc1267effc8071d37f7d606efbe
TBR=mtklein@google.com,bsalomon@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/750583002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 0ddad31012dabfc1267effc8071d37f7d606efbe |
|
21-Nov-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Add MultiPictureDraw to nanobench
I would like some guard against performance regressions on our side before turning layer hoisting on in Chromium.
TBR=bsalomon@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/731973005
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 6838d854a87e79f1fbb7b89b9f395155ad44dc0a |
|
29-Oct-2014 |
mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> |
Try out SkTree in nanobench.
Looks like a fairly large recording speed win with no playback cost.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/653023003
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| c7f7f467df07be73b22dbee38a59762997eb19bc |
|
21-Oct-2014 |
mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> |
Draw SKPs in 256x256 tiles in nanobench.
(This CL will certainly trigger performance regression alerts. Tiled drawing is slower than non-tiled drawing.)
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/669983002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 962890568ddac03d8eb8467a2e81b6f2b7f046f0 |
|
10-Sep-2014 |
mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> |
Distinguish common and unique names for skiaperf.com.
Turns out we tack on the size post-facto in ResultsWriter::bench(), so the only
place we need getUniqueName() to differ from getName() is SKPBench.
BUG=skia:
R=jcgregorio@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/552303004
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| c5ba71d2e5cd426def66fa49dcf003e5b2c98dc7 |
|
04-Sep-2014 |
robertphillips <robertphillips@google.com> |
Change SkPicture::draw to playback
R=reed@google.com
Author: robertphillips@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/540963002
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|
| 92007583e43115998412ac8b0a06cc2780eb025c |
|
01-Aug-2014 |
mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> |
SKPs-as-benches in nanobench
This is meant to replace bench_pictures.
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=tryserver.skia:Build-Mac10.7-Clang-Arm7-Release-iOS-Trybot
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com, jcgregorio@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/425393004
/external/skia/bench/SKPBench.cpp
|