| b5e89c6debca90be92bf5bc2e0e79d109de6d08f |
|
02-Apr-2016 |
Jeff Sharkey <jsharkey@android.com> |
Support direct-boot tests.
Add shell commands to check on current FBE status and system ready
status. Mark variables without first-class locking as volatile.
Fix bug where UI automation would crash while device was locked by
marking it as forced direct-boot aware.
Bug: 26498834
Change-Id: Ib4dfb9350925e5413f93a09baacf84c62f2ba0ea
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 8a372a0a280127743ce9a7ce4b6198c7a02d2a4f |
|
16-Mar-2016 |
Jeff Sharkey <jsharkey@android.com> |
Refactoring FBE APIs based on council feedback.
Mostly consists of removing the word "encryption" from most APIs,
since we can't actually make promises about the data being encrypted.
Bug: 27531029
Change-Id: Iace9d7c4e64716abf86ed11847c40f3947e1d625
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| e88e2665471c7b620fd3b1baca024fc9e705ee32 |
|
24-Feb-2016 |
Jeff Sharkey <jsharkey@android.com> |
Update accessibility to be encryption-aware.
Look for both EA and non-EA accessibility services, but when the user
is locked only bind to EA services. Once the user is unlocked, we
take another pass and bind to any non-EA services.
We only consider disabling accessibility once the user is unlocked,
since there could be non-EA services waiting in the wings.
Bug: 25860579
Change-Id: I97bd019661457c3577d629ba12290d02f026011a
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| a6b64f5099b7be6e8384958d8bcddb97bb06ec93 |
|
05-Dec-2015 |
Phil Weaver <pweaver@google.com> |
Gesture dispatch from accessibility services.
Add public APIs to describe gestures and dispatch them from
an accessibility service. Added a new capability that
services must declare to have this capability.
Bug: 22514086
Change-Id: I9bff2d9335f0310115112d14b7ed033a6d6c2393
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 214fb68767502f5fede643a062c1dc5975d75b27 |
|
17-Nov-2015 |
Alan Viverette <alanv@google.com> |
APIs for querying and controlling display magnification
Also separates magnification state and touch event handling. Moves
callbacks for window manager changes and display state changes into
the magnification controller.
Bug: 22718911
Change-Id: I3a8ba060a07d8f1f51856855a5f85601766fd45d
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| f7174e87b6007000777b0124de9cef70d8618788 |
|
12-Jun-2014 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Fix backwards compatibility for introspected windows.
1. The APIs for introspecting interactive windows were reporting only
the touchable windows but were missing the focused window. The user
can interact with the latter by typing, hence it should always be
reported. Also this was breaking backwards compatibility as if the
focused window is covered by a modal one, the focused window was not
reporeted and this was putting the active window in a bad state as
the latter is either the focused window or the one the user is touching.
2. Window change events are too frequent as on window transition things
are chanign a lot. Now we are trottling the windows changed events
at the standard recurring accessibility event interval.
3. Fixed a wrong flag comparison and removed some unneded code.
buy:15434666
bug:15432989
Change-Id: I825b33067e8cbf26396a4d38642bde4907b6427a
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 8e3feb15c5aec2c72b0ef120a1da325e1e8f0dda |
|
24-Feb-2014 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Added accessibility APIs for introspecting interactive windows.
1. The old introspection model was allowing querying only the active window
which is the one the user is touching or the focused one if no window is
touched. This was limiting as auto completion drop downs were not inspectable,
there was not way to know when the IME toggles, non-focusable windows were
not inspectable if the user taps them as until a screen-reader starts
introspecting the users finger is up, accessibility focus was limited to
only one window and the user couldn't use gestures to visit the whole UI,
and other things I can't remember right now.
The new APIs allow getting all interactive windows, i.e. ones that a
sighted user can interact with. This prevents an accessibility service
from interacting with content a sighter user cannot. The list of windows
can be obtained from an accessibility service or the host window from an
accessibility node info. Introspecting windows obey the same rules for
introspecting node, i.e. the service has to declare this capability
in its manifest.
When some windows change accessibility services receive a new type
of event. Initially the types of windows is very limited. We provide
the bounds in screen, layer, and some other properties which are
enough for a client to determined the spacial and hierarchical
relationship of the windows.
2. Update the documentation in AccessibilityService for newer event types.
3. LongArray was not removing elements properly.
4. Composite accessibility node ids were not properly constructed as they
are composed of two ints, each taking 32 bits. However, the values for
undefined were -1 so composing a 64 long from -1, -1 prevents from getting
back these values when unpacking.
5. Some apps were generating inconsistent AccessibilityNodeInfo tree. Added
a check that enforces such trees to be well formed on dev builds.
6. Removed an necessary code for piping the touch exploration state to
the policy as it should just use the AccessibilityManager from context.
7. When view's visibility changed it was not firing an event to notify
clients it disappeared/appeared. Also ViewGroup was sending accessibility
events for changes if the view is included for accessibility but this is
wrong as there may be a service that want all nodes, hence events from them.
The accessibility manager service takes care of delivering events from
not important for accessibility nodes only to services that want such.
8. Several places were asking for prefetching of sibling but not predecessor
nodes which resulted in prefetching of unconnected subtrees.
9. The local AccessibilityManager implementation was relying on the backing
service being ready when it is created but it can be fetched from a context
before that. If that happens the local manager was in a broken state forever.
Now it is more robust and starts working properly once the backing service
is up. Several places were lacking locking.
bug:13331285
Change-Id: Ie51166d4875d5f3def8d29d77973da4b9251f5c8
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 23be199171bedb05e81864f8941492af066fa667 |
|
03-Oct-2013 |
Alan Viverette <alanv@google.com> |
Add importantForAccessibility mode to block entire hierarchy
Since older versions of the platform will crash if the mode is
set to 3, this CL adds an extra bit and uses 4 as the mode. This
will also cleanly default the mode to AUTO on unsupported
platforms.
BUG: 11031947
Change-Id: I48035abbf35523d65cead6f27be10f8087973ceb
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 00d17f7aab54ef055d35da603dab5a7bae751876 |
|
07-Jun-2013 |
Scott Main <smain@google.com> |
add attributes to accessibility service info
Change-Id: I3651544164f718003b8eb1235a7d723f1bcee5be
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 11adf6dc2438260c3e0d79cc189bcb4f6f15e9f4 |
|
24-Apr-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
The touch exploration capability is dynamically granted pre-JellyBeanMR2.
Since the enable touch exploration capability is dynamically granted by
the user for apps targeting pre-JellybeanMR2 API level, we have to properly
update the accessibility service info for that service and also avoid
caching copies of the service info.
bug:8633951
Change-Id: I83dd1c852706ec55d40cda7209ad842889fb970a
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| db7da0eb8b7d515c168d5b410764e24c9a0f9431 |
|
23-Apr-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Fixing bugs exposed when moving accessibility CTS tests to UiAutomation.
1. UiAutomation#executeAndWaitForEvent method was invoking the passed
runnable while holding the lock which may lead to a deadlock. For
example: a runnable that calls getActivity() gets us into a state
like this.
2. UI automation services did not get all capabilities such a
service can have. Now a UI test service gets all of them.
3. When UiAutomation was exiting for event fired as a result of a
performed action, it was checking whether the received evnet time
is strictly before the time of executing the command that should
fire the event. However, if the execution is fast enough, i.e.
less than one millisecond, then the event time and the execution
time are the same. This was leading to a missed signal in rare
cases.
4. AccessibilityNodeInfoCache was not clearing the relevant state
for accessibility focus clearing event.
5. Accessibility text traversal in TextView was partially using text
and partially content description - broken. Now we are using the
text since for text view and content desc for other views. In other
words, we are using the most precise text we have.
6. AccessibilityManagerService was not granting capabilities of a
UiAutomation service - plainly wrong.
CTS change:https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/300693/
bug:8695422
bug:8657560
Change-Id: I9afc5c3c69eb51f1c01930959232f44681b15e86
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 688a6977cf7673ed0542ab3d839053c4e38a4dbd |
|
17-Apr-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Replacing accessibility service permissions with capability attributes.
Accessibility services can perform special operations such as retrieve
the screen content, enable explore by touch, etc. To ensure the user
is aware that the service will perform special operations we were using
permissions. However, the special operations cannot be performed unless
the service is really enabled by the user and it is at this point that
we want to notify the user about the service capabilities.
This change adds capability attributes to the accessibility service's
meta-data XML file. The service has to declare the capability and when
it is enabled we show the user the capabilities in the warining dialog.
bug:8633951
Change-Id: Id3442dc71dad018e606888afdc40834682fdb037
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 57bf88508e0491caced22c4c592d33aba6d88129 |
|
08-Feb-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Refactoring of the Accessibility.
1. The accessibility manager service updates its internal state
based on which settings are enabled, what accessibility services
are installed and what features are requested by the enabled
services. It was trying to do the minimal amount of work to
react to contextual changes like these which resulted in missed
cases and complex code. Now there is a single method that reads
the contextual information and single method that reacts to
contextual changes. This makes the code much easier to maintain.
2. The accessibility manager service was not updating its internal
state when requested features from accessibility services change.
It was relying on changing system settings and reacting to the
settings change. This is problematic since the internal state is
not updated atomically which leads to race condition bugs. For
example, if touch exploration is enabled and a service requests
it is disabled, the internal state will not be updated but a
request for a settings change will be made. Now while the settings
change is propagating another request form the same service
comes to enable touch exploration but the system incorrectly
thinks touch exploration is enabled. At the end the feature is
disabled even though it was requested.
3. Fixed a potential NPE if the accessibility input filter's event
handler was nullified between processing two event batches.
4. Fixed a bug where, if magnification is enabled, it does not work
on the settings screen since the magnified bounds are not pushed
from the window manager to the accessibility manager.
Change-Id: Idf629a06480e12f0d88372762df6c024fe0d7856
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 901309ce5904cbc7b07b01b49ac5cd26b356998a |
|
05-Feb-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Updating AccessibilityNodeInfo JavaDoc
Change-Id: I8f80ed127c73dd4d8bcf9fe81575bb438b3d0f57
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 447d94684ee73046d769649d8247aacd581bd6e3 |
|
01-Feb-2013 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
"Fixing backwards cmpatibility for enabling explore by touch""
This reverts commit d1ed3cea37e4156eab14b7dc8207a520c9eab700
Change-Id: I622ef034526f8f006a5a233e72487b062020e4f6
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| d1ed3cea37e4156eab14b7dc8207a520c9eab700 |
|
01-Feb-2013 |
Mike Cleron <mcleron@google.com> |
Revert "Fixing backwards cmpatibility for enabling explore by touch"
This reverts commit 0a9c7c144671f70f5f1af222050bd3ec6b11fe41
Change-Id: I8da530a6d0a57163522d5a63326e787a8d22ecbf
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 0a9c7c144671f70f5f1af222050bd3ec6b11fe41 |
|
01-Feb-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Fixing backwards cmpatibility for enabling explore by touch
Change-Id: I8cbc4f03223d289547e3f3f6d1f528ad5b4f6f72
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 0ec0418c6eac5076774a74855725d9df53141907 |
|
01-Feb-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Update the JavaDoc for the new accessibility permissions
Change-Id: I1d52e848fec6c56cdb1f8ff66d07414dd2518086
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 3822896e226567c6cd3ef84518d318abd33a7624 |
|
29-Jan-2013 |
Svetoslav <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Remove "enhance web scripts" from settings and make it requested by plug-ins.
Currently we have an "enhance web accessibility" setting that has to be
enabled to make sure web content is accessible. We added the setting to
get user consent because we are injecting JavaScript-based screen-reader
pulled from the Google infrastructure. However, many users do not know
that and (as expected) do not read the user documentation, resulting in
critique for lacking accessibility support in WebViews with JavaScript
enabled (Browser, Gmail, etc).
To smoothen the user experience now "enhance web accessibility" is a
feature an accessibility plug-in can request, similarly to explore by
touch. Now a user does not need to know that she has to explicitly
enable the setting and web accessibility will work out-of-the-box.
Before we were showing a dialog when a plug-in tries to put the device
in a touch exploration mode. However, now that we have one more feature
a plug-in can request, showing two dialogs (assume a plug-in wants both
features) will mean that a user should potentially deal with three
dialogs, one for enabling the service, and one for each feature. We
could merge the dialogs but still the user has to poke two dialogs.
It seems that the permission mechanism is a perfect fit for getting
user permission for an app to do something, in this case to enable
an accessibility feature. We need a separate permission for explore
by touch and enhance web accessibility since the former changes the
interaction model and the latter injects JavaScript in web pages. It
is critical to get user consent for the script injection part so we
need a well-documented permission rather a vague umbrella permission
for poking accessibility features. To allow better grouping of the
accessibility permissions this patch adds a permission group as well.
bug:8089372
Change-Id: Ic125514c34f191aea0416a469e4b3481ab3200b9
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 80943d8daa6ab31ab5c486d57aea406aa0730d58 |
|
02-Jan-2013 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Adding UI test automation APIs.
This change adds APIs support for implementing UI tests. Such tests do
not rely on internal application structure and can span across application
boundaries. UI automation APIs are encapsulated in the UiAutomation object
that is provided by an Instrumentation object. It is initialized by the
system and can be used for both introspecting the screen and performing
interactions simulating a user. UI test are normal instrumentation tests
and are executed on the device.
UiAutomation uses the accessibility APIs to introspect the screen and
a special delegate object to perform privileged operations such as
injecting input events. Since instrumentation tests are invoked by a shell
command, the shell program launching the tests creates a delegate object and
passes it as an argument to started instrumentation. This delegate
allows the APK that runs the tests to access some privileged operations
protected by a signature level permissions which are explicitly granted
to the shell user.
The UiAutomation object also supports running tests in the legacy way
where the tests are run as a Java shell program. This enables existing
UiAutomator tests to keep working while the new ones should be implemented
using the new APIs. The UiAutomation object exposes lower level APIs which
allow simulation of arbitrary user interactions and writing complete UI test
cases. Clients, such as UiAutomator, are encouraged to implement higher-
level APIs which minimize development effort and can be used as a helper
library by the test developer.
The benefit of this change is decoupling UiAutomator from the system
since the former was calling hidden APIs which required that it is
bundled in the system image. This prevented UiAutomator from being
evolved separately from the system. Also UiAutomator was creating
additional API surface in the system image. Another benefit of the new
design is that now test cases have access to a context and can use
public platform APIs in addition to the UiAutomator ones. Further,
third-parties can develop their own higher level test APIs on top
of the lower level ones exposes by UiAutomation.
bug:8028258
Also this change adds the fully qualified resource name of the view's
id in the emitted AccessibilityNodeInfo if a special flag is set while
configuring the accessibility service. Also added is API for looking
up node infos by this id. The id resource name is relatively more stable
compared to the generaed id number which may change from one build to
another. This API facilitate reuing the already defined ids for UI
automation.
bug:7678973
Change-Id: I589ad14790320dec8a33095953926c2a2dd0228b
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| eb9862fd4c6ba1745a0f6c997e85643a4ded0643 |
|
07-Sep-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Adding FEEDBACK_BRAILLE to AccessibilityServiceInfo.
1. The feedback type provided by braille devices differs from all
already predefined types and this change defines braille
feedback type. Braille does not fit in the already predefined
categories.
bug:6998945
Change-Id: Ide6043bed03fdecd6d2ee45a08762f5bd07a2118
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 3ec2e1b94ab502bfa8d5e8750716108f69aa18d2 |
|
09-May-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Remove activation gestures form reported and add a touch explore requesting flag.
1. Delegating activation gestures has several issues that we should
decide how to handle if possible before allowing an accessibility
service to take over them:
A) It is needed that every view than can be clicked or long pressed on
reacts to such as a response to calling performClick and performLongPress
which is not necessary true since the view may watch the touch
events and do its own click long click detection. As a result it may
be possible that there are view a user cannot interact with in
touch exploration mode but can if not in that mode.
B) Clicking or long pressing on a different location in a view may yield
different results, for example NumberPicker. Ideally such views have
to implement AccessibilityNodeProvide which provider handles correctly
the request for click long press on virtual nodes. Some apps however
just fire different hover accessibility events when the user is over
a specific semantic portion of the view but do not provide virtual
nodes. Hence, a user will not be able to interact with such semantic
regions but the system can achieve that by sending the click/long click
at the precise location in the view that was last touch explored.
2. Adding a flag on accessibility service info to request explore by touch
mode. There is no need to put the device in this mode if node of the currently
enabled accessibility services supports it. Now the problem is inverted and
the service has to explicitly state its capability.
3. Fixing a bug where includeImportantViews was ignored for automation
services.
Change-Id: I3b29a19f24ab5e26ee29f974bbac2197614c9e2a
Conflicts:
api/current.txt
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| fefd20e927b7252d63acb7bb1852c5188e3c1b2e |
|
20-Apr-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Adding an opt-in mechanism for gesture detection in AccessibilityService.
1. An accessibility service has to explicitly opt in to be notified
for gestures by the system. There is only one accessibility service
that handles gestures and in case it does not handle a gesture
the system performs default handling. This default handling ensures
that we have gesture navigation even if no accessibility service
would like to participate/customize the interaction model.
bug:5932640
Change-Id: Id8194293bd94097b455e9388b68134a45dc3b8fa
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 4213804541a8b05cd0587b138a2fd9a3b7fd9350 |
|
20-Mar-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Accessibility focus - framework
Usefulness: Keep track of the current user location in the screen when
traversing the it. Enabling structural and directional
navigation over all elements on the screen. This enables
blind users that know the application layout to efficiently
locate desired elements as opposed to try touch exploring the
region where the the element should be - very tedious.
Rationale: There are two ways to implement accessibility focus One is
to let accessibility services keep track of it since they
have access to the screen content, and another to let the view
hierarchy keep track of it. While the first approach would
require almost no work on our part it poses several challenges
which make it a sub-optimal choice. Having the accessibility focus
in the accessibility service would require that service to scrape
the window content every time it changes to sync the view tree
state and the accessibility focus location. Pretty much the service
will have to keep an off screen model of the screen content. This
could be quite challenging to get right and would incur performance
cost for the multiple IPCs to repeatedly fetch the screen content.
Further, keeping virtual accessibility focus (i.e. in the service)
would require sync of the input and accessibility focus. This could
be challenging to implement right as well. Also, having an unlimited
number of accessibility services we cannot guarantee that they will
have a proper implementation, if any, to allow users to perform structural
navigation of the screen content. Assuming two accessibility
services implement structural navigation via accessibility focus,
there is not guarantee that they will behave similarly by default,
i.e. provide some standard way to navigate the screen content.
Also feedback from experienced accessibility researchers, specifically
T.V Raman, provides evidence that having virtual accessibility focus
creates many issues and it is very hard to get right.
Therefore, keeping accessibility focus in the system will avoid
keeping an off-screen model in accessibility services, it will always
be in sync with the state of the view hierarchy and the input focus.
Also this will allow having a default behavior for traversing the
screen via this accessibility focus that is consistent in all
accessibility services. We provide accessibility services with APIs to
override this behavior but all of them will perform screen traversal
in a consistent way by default.
Behavior: If accessibility is enabled the accessibility focus is the leading one
and the input follows it. Putting accessibility focus on a view moves
the input focus there. Clearing the accessibility focus of a view, clears
the input focus of this view. If accessibility focus is on a view that
cannot take input focus, then no other view should have input focus.
In accessibility mode we initially give accessibility focus to the topmost
view and no view has input focus. This ensures consistent behavior accross
all apps. Note that accessibility focus can move hierarchically in the
view tree and having it at the root is better than putting it where the
input focus would be - at the first input focusable which could be at
an arbitrary depth in the view tree. By default not all views are reported
for accessibility, only the important ones. A view may be explicitly labeled
as important or not for accessibility, or the system determines which one
is such - default. Important views for accessibility are all views that are
not dumb layout managers used only to arrange their chidren. Since the same
content arrangement can be obtained via different combintation of layout
managers, such managers cannot be used to reliably determine the application
structure. For example, a user should see a list as a list view with several
list items and each list item as a text view and a button as opposed to seeing
all the layout managers used to arrange the list item's content.
By default only important for accessibility views are regared for accessibility
purposes. View not regarded for accessibility neither fire accessibility events,
nor are reported being on the screen. An accessibility service may request the
system to regard all views. If the target SDK of an accessibility services is
less than JellyBean, then all views are regarded for accessibility.
Note that an accessibility service that requires all view to be ragarded for
accessibility may put accessibility focus on any view. Hence, it may implement
any navigational paradigm if desired. Especially considering the fact that
the system is detecting some standard gestures and delegates their processing
to an accessibility service. The default implementation of an accessibility
services performs the defualt navigation.
bug:5932640
bug:5605641
Change-Id: Ieac461d480579d706a847b9325720cb254736ebe
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 110414928ae13674b7ec6b816a45cf70ed521683 |
|
03-Apr-2012 |
Joe Fernandez <joefernandez@google.com> |
am c1a0e54d: am b459b619: am 945b7cb3: Merge "docs: Accessibility Dev Guide (subsumes Accessibility Best Practices)" into ics-mr1
* commit 'c1a0e54de12aee41163b84a25ea8dfc8b64304dc':
docs: Accessibility Dev Guide (subsumes Accessibility Best Practices)
|
| e1302edd40c5cc264f842e17e3796e0a11d6f045 |
|
06-Feb-2012 |
Joe Fernandez <joefernandez@google.com> |
docs: Accessibility Dev Guide (subsumes Accessibility Best Practices)
Change-Id: Id7e3f647042d2afd390abe851be1c3b561af33ca
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| c6c25f9e28a4de73261106a80ae098347524dd2a |
|
10-Mar-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
AccessibilityServiceInfo does not convert correctly feedback type to string.
1. When the feedback type is set to TYPES_ALL_MASK the method
feedbackTypeToString was not generating a string with all
feedback types. Also the generated string sometimes could
have a comma appended after the last feedback type name
- this happens if the feedback type contains unknown type
flag.
Change-Id: I848c520cf7dae16dcd882f68275869c7ab656dd7
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 3d0edd31d8082b7b8b2cdee5efda216179f677b5 |
|
04-Jan-2012 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
AccessibilityService description not internationalized.
1. AccessibilityServiceInfo loading the description string on
creation and using this value. Hence, changing the locale
results in reporting incorrectly localized string. Added a
new loadDescription method to return the localized version.
2. Deprecated the old method.
bug:5807616
Change-Id: Id82bda3c6a90fa6681b035d20da0b8688ed68da3
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| bb1b9ea8a488eec833b0be18c45dae8505876042 |
|
20-Oct-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
AccessibilityServiceInfo does not report properly the feedback type.
Since the feedback type is an integer the bits of which correspond to a given
feedback type, the AccessibilityNodeInfo#feedbackTypeToString should return a
string representation of all feedback types. The current implementation
incorrectly assumes that the argument had only one flag set. Note that this
is a new ICS API and we would like to have this fixed.
bug:5486933
Change-Id: I5e461c385e199cce4c3054907ff0acf5e9d92afc
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 00aabf7d187bc05408199bd687a538b2e68bdc17 |
|
21-Jul-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Touch exploration state set to clients asynchronously and depended on talking service being enabled.
1. Upon registration of an accessibility client the latter received only
the accessiiblity state and waiting for the touch exploration state
to be sent by the system in async manner. This led the very first
check of touch exploration state is checked a wrong value to be reported.
Now a state of the accessibility layer is returned to the client
upon registration.
2. Removing the dependency on talking accessibility service to be enabled
for getting into touch exploration mode. What if the user wants to use
an accessibility service that shows a dialog with the text of the touched
view?
bug:5051546
Change-Id: Ib377babb3f560929ee73bd3d8b0d277341ba23f7
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 35bfedeaba724aeadc6f6c890269cb6bf7ef42f5 |
|
15-Jul-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Touch exploration separate setting and API to poll the latter state.
1. Seperated touch exploration to be a seperate setting rather being
magically enabled by the system of accessiiblity is on the there
is at leas one accessibility service that speaks enabled. Now
there is a setting for requesting touch exploration but still the
system will enabled it only if that makes sense i.e. accessibility
is on and one accessibility service that speaks is enabled.
2. Added public API for checking of touch exploration is enabled.
3. Added description attribute in accessibility service declaration
which will be shown to the user before enabling the service.
4. Added API for quick cloning of AccessibilityNodeInfo.
5. Added clone functionality to SparseArray, SparseIntArray, and
SparseBooleanArray.
bug:5034010
bug:5033928
Change-Id: Ia442edbe55c20309244061cd9d24e0545c01b54f
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 0f55cc33f658b2793a12d609a0989348077324a4 |
|
17-Jul-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
AccessibilityNodeInfo does not report checkable coreclty.
1. AccessibilitiyNodeInfo's checkable property was not set.
bug:5039205
Change-Id: I083d1c357c6d9875536e66e355c8a33bd580cee6
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 38e8b4e5bc3c93affdffbc064fd9db5aeccc3e8e |
|
30-Jun-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Updating accessibility documentation.
Change-Id: Ice8cf9ac6918b3bfa553776c68d4619fa6559cf8
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| cc4053e031371456fe54d51bbad1db721db4ae38 |
|
23-May-2011 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Accessibility serviceconfiguration via meta-data
Note: This is a part of two CL change and contains the
system changes without updates to the settings.
1. Added a mechanism for configuring an accessibility service via
XML file specified in a meta-data tag (similar to IMEs).
2. Added property for specifying a settings activity for an
accessibility service.
3. Refactored the APIs in AccessibilityManager to return
lists of AccessiblityServiceInfo instead ServiceInfo
since the former describes an AccessibilityService in
particular (similar to IMEs).
Change-Id: Ie8781bb7e0cdb329e583b6702a612a507367ad7b
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 9b31779eab896bdcc0922473b183c979cc0b874f |
|
18-Feb-2010 |
Svetoslav Ganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Fix for bug 2448479
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|
| 75986cf9bc57ef11ad70f36fb77fbbf5d63af6ec |
|
15-May-2009 |
svetoslavganov <svetoslavganov@google.com> |
Accessibility feature - framework changes (replacing 698, 699, 700, 701 and merging with the latest Donut)
/frameworks/base/core/java/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo.java
|