History log of /frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
e46393e04b94b7c583042b259ac935d00af9b640 29-Jul-2016 Tony Mak <tonymak@google.com> We should registerContentObserver with app's user id

Change-Id: Icef7a71f1773c102b766625271ed0156d6c59d77
Fix: 30464189
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
4b425712c6a777148af767cb30240d632c51f55b 28-Jun-2016 Christopher Tate <ctate@google.com> Fix #29737133 : content-trigger jobs not running properly

When removing the ContentObserver wrapper from our internal
bookkeeping we were using the wrong key. That led to future
re-registrations thinking they were reusing a currently-
registered observers, but instead never getting onChange()
notifications.

Change-Id: Id3111db057ae63194049d7d48d45b75be6bb0000
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
121e1645d1396b47f0fefa978f8c77d2c4c6c968 22-Jun-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Fix issue #29545190: JobScheduler ContentUri NOTIFY_FOR_DESCENDANTS flag...

...isn't respected if previous job was scheduled with same URI

Change-Id: Ib04f6d7cf72e7efc8e84c1a759e91ba520eda139
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
e9a988caca733d2f292991a52a0047685a69812f 28-May-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Work on issue #28942589: Tune job scheduler

We now have a new settings key that provides all of the existing
tuning parameters, plus some newly redone ones for dealing with
different memory levels.

Changed the minimum batching for overall jobs from 2 to 1, so
we will never get in the way of immediately scheduling jobs
when the developer asks for this. We should now be able to rely
on the doze modes to do better batching of jobs for us when it
is really important.

Also work on issue #28981330: Excessive JobScheduler wakeup alarms.
Use a work source with scheduled alarms to blame them on the app
whose job they are being scheduled for, and add a check for whether
a job's timing constraint has been satisfied before considering it
a possible candidate for the next alarm. (If it is satisified,
the time is in the past, so we should not schedule an alarm for it.)

Finally clean up a bunch of the dumpsys output to make it easier
to understand.

Change-Id: I06cf2c1310448f47cf386f393e9b267335fabaeb
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
2c4b8f9f11cce04ac246f2335d39243641c26b83 11-May-2016 Christopher Tate <ctate@google.com> Fix iterator double-advance in ContentObserverController

Bug 28725391

Change-Id: I1994e46645dbf716f3ef5d12f7d4833264e6937a
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
ef3aa6ee53c5e4f1c50dd5a9b5821c54e449d4b3 30-Apr-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Fix issue #28477006: Add small event log to job scheduler

Added. Also fixed dumpsys output when filtering, to apply the
filter to (almost) all of the output.

Change-Id: Iafb446599ad8fddbe8a766784deff618a6cfdbb7
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
8db0fc15b85c6501a0418b17edee2d9c447b408a 12-Apr-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> More work on issue #26390151: Add new JobScheduler API...

...for monitoring content providers

We now have some delays before reporting URI changes, to allow
them to batch together.

Also clean up debug output, and fix some issues with how we
were managing the content observer state.

And while I am here, fix the device idle and app idle controllers
to no longer maintain their own list of jobs, but just directly
iterate over the JobStore.

Change-Id: If3fdff23c00c2f1b99901a9be096d851562d3439
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
141f11c82a2dbf042833f75aeae6f028e8ae2084 06-Apr-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> More work on issue #26390151: Add new JobScheduler API...

...for monitoring content providers

- Improve media provider change reporting so that observers can
avoid spurious reports of the top-level content directory changing.
- Fix a bug where collected content changes while a job was running
were not being properly propagated to the next job.

Change-Id: I29e3c2960e6fec75b16ee3ee6588d47342bf8c75
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
b0001f6fb1383d9824c2733896b0b348e7f77240 16-Feb-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Remove internal locking from JobStatus.

Now all state of JobStatus is implicitly protected by the lock
of whoever is using it -- in this case the global lock for the
JobSchedulerService. This allows us to remove all of the atomic
variables and just replace those with a simple bit field.

The required constraints for a job are now statically defined
once a JobStatus is created, and don't change. (They wouldn't
change before, but now this is absolutely specified to be the
case.) This required tweaking the constructors a bit so that
the earliest and latest run times are computed as part of the
core class initialization.

Also clarified methods on StateController that are called with
the lock held, and took advantage of that in the various
controllers to not now redundantly re-acquire the lock.

Change-Id: I595c5e7d1bff1bd2ff906d612581af82878a25ee
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
33d31c5b70c7d056e799e34bb6eccbe6939714ea 16-Feb-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Simplify job scheduler service locking.

Unify all locks to just one lock protecting the entire service.
There is really no need for more complicated locking -- there is
nothing in the code that can take a long time to complete. And
having a single lock will allow various parts of the code to be
much simpler and easier to maintain.

This is just the first step of the change, switching all of the
locking to use one lock. With this done, we can now start
simplifying the code. For example, JobStatus no longer needs
to do any locking (or have atomic variables and such), it can
just rely on its callers holding the global service lock.

Change-Id: I502916ed7f2994b601750c67a59a96b1a4e95c6d
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java
1a30bd9b13fd127d9bbfdc5fd4cb2f80ab7ece21 11-Jan-2016 Dianne Hackborn <hackbod@google.com> Add and implement JobScheduler content observer APIs.

Allows one to schedule jobs to run when content URIs
change, and find out what changed when the job executes.

This required adding a new API to StateController to
tell it when we are about to start executing a job, so
we can transfer the currently collected changes out of
its internal state to fill it in to the JobParameters.

Also some additional dumpsys debug output to help
understand what is going on in the job scheduler.

Change-Id: I91f51b226ff4add7a271a8333beffa5e86c7bf18
/frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/job/controllers/ContentObserverController.java