| 538413376d6608f1765e0913be72ff9c5c3c9891 |
|
25-Nov-2015 |
Makoto Onuki <omakoto@google.com> |
Show per-app CP2 usage in bugreport
Note we don't persist the numbers, so they're number since CP2
started.
Bug 24949200
Sample output:
Client activities:
UID Query Insert Update Delete Batch Insert Update Delete:
10010 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10011 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10048 185 3 3 0 9 1013 150 1
10057 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Change-Id: Ia68ea8090cc569fb4483560944db126964875458
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| f45c0a2612c7cdf6ee29242e65a30476537cc699 |
|
24-Nov-2015 |
Makoto Onuki <omakoto@google.com> |
Show basic contacts stats in bugreport.
Bug 24949200
Example output:
PROVIDER ContentProviderRecord{5b986d5 u0 com.android.providers.contacts/.ContactsProvider2} pid=18434
Client:
Contact aggregator type: class com.android.providers.contacts.aggregation.ContactAggregator2
FastScrollingIndex stats:
request=0 miss=0 (0%) avg time=0ms
Contacts stats:
Database: Contacts
Accounts:
1 makoto.android.6@gmail.com com.google (null)
2 makoto.android.1@gmail.com com.google (null)
3 makoto.android.1@gmail.com com.google plus
Contacts:
# of visible: 2343
# of invisible: 3103
Max # of raw contacts: 3
Avg # of raw contacts: 1.001933612632936
Raw contacts (per account):
1 total # of raw contacts: 2018, max # per contact: 3, avg # per contact: 1.0009920634920635
2 total # of raw contacts: 1077, max # per contact: 2, avg # per contact: 1.0009293680297398
3 total # of raw contacts: 14, max # per contact: 1, avg # per contact: 1.0
Data (per account):
1 total # of data:15763, max # per raw contact: 15, avg # per raw contact: 7.811199207135778
2 total # of data:6887, max # per raw contact: 20, avg # per raw contact: 6.394614670380687
3 total # of data:95, max # per raw contact: 10, avg # per raw contact: 6.785714285714286
Database: Profile
Accounts:
1 makoto.android.1@gmail.com com.google plus
Contacts:
# of visible: 0
# of invisible: 1
Max # of raw contacts: 1
Avg # of raw contacts: 1.0
Raw contacts (per account):
1 total # of raw contacts: 1, max # per contact: 1, avg # per contact: 1.0
Data (per account):
1 total # of data:6, max # per raw contact: 6, avg # per raw contact: 6.0
Change-Id: Iae9f1f904b623a4f64684da99b825b2cb1127758
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| ac86c67dc61b46e5dd13d78438deae22dc64cdbe |
|
20-Mar-2015 |
Fedrik Ålund <fredrik.alund@mimer.com> |
Don't call notifyChange() until after the transaction have been commited.
If we call notifyChange() before the commit have been done clients that are listening for changes will start reloading before the transaction is finished and this will lead to unnecesarry waits.
Change-Id: I404bae39ace3d7557c4b48ccf4b757f3d986dbe7
Signed-off-by: Fedrik Ålund <fredrik.alund@mimer.com>
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| ae32283e7fc5b749df96523d8bb343b9068b65ba |
|
09-May-2012 |
Makoto Onuki <omakoto@google.com> |
Fix transaction handling in the provider
Fixed issues that will happen when a batch operation for applyBatch()
contain operations for both the contacts db and the profile db.
- Make sure to set the right transaction listener when starting a transaction.
There were cases where we started a transaction on the contacts db but passsing
the profile provider as the listener, and vice versa.
- Make sure transaction callbacks operate on the correct DB.
There were cases where ContactsProvider2.onCommit() and its sbilings would
operate on the profile DB, not on the contacts db.
- Change the transaction finishing order.
When we start transactions on both the contacts and the profile DB, we do so
on the contacts db first, and then on the profile db. But when we clsoe them,
we did it in the same order, which could potentially cause a deadlock.
Now we close them in the reverse order; the profile db first, then the
contacts db.
- Remove mActiveDb.
This wasn't set in switchTo{Profile,Contact}Mode(), but was lazily initialized.
But I wasn't too sure if I always set the right db at the right timing.
Looks like I forgot to do so in a few cases. Let's just remove it and always
explicitly get the database from the current db helper.
Bug 6250673
Change-Id: Idd18fc173596c973d0ff8b6e1b2456715c0f14f8
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| 74e8f30b3a67af4defd8f73c503e794785671fee |
|
03-Feb-2012 |
Makoto Onuki <omakoto@google.com> |
Add debug logs to applyBatch
Change-Id: I646c7e091c2e778516e6287e3e91770e556ad71f
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| b91899a113c499ef96fe5719398558b4cfd128c2 |
|
01-Nov-2011 |
Dave Santoro <dsantoro@google.com> |
Fix double-close of transactions if yields fail.
This was causing the exception that caused the failed yield to be
swallowed instead of propagated, as the second close was failing
due to lack of a DB lock on the thread.
Bug 5515111
Change-Id: Ic847801655b28301913b07b3929794b3ba16c5ae
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| 376917cea44aec4dfd68dec23522353b142535fd |
|
06-Oct-2011 |
Dave Santoro <dsantoro@google.com> |
Allow multiple inserts in bulk between yields.
This should help to optimize these operations to avoid the overhead
of doing lots of individual inserts when the database is very active.
Bug 5353552
Change-Id: I5b3a06f41637452ec98297c66579fb7d4f81e2ec
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| 6efb7db26598b105342d02207e0ca1c8725c10da |
|
22-Sep-2011 |
Dave Santoro <dsantoro@google.com> |
Fixes and cleanup for transactions.
- Make the thread-local transaction shared between the contacts and
profile providers (as the implementation intended).
- Remove a bunch of extraneous variables from the contacts provider.
- Ensure that the profile provider switches the delegate into profile
mode before running onBegin() or onCommit().
- Port the fix for applying contact changes to the profile DB.
- Fix an issue with profile aggregation after the profile has been
deleted.
- Addressed a case in which we would create (and possibly hold onto)
a profile DB transaction erroneously.
- Ported fix for aggregation when raw contacts are deleted.
Bug 5320369
Change-Id: I1f36d4c87c6b655dfcb5e339f151d3bf1d37a437
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|
| 078f588cef389358adabc579de00747878f3c108 |
|
21-Sep-2011 |
Dave Santoro <dsantoro@google.com> |
Refactor transactions for contacts.
Rather than extending SQLiteContentProvider, the profile and contacts
providers now extend AbstractContactsProvider, which handles keeping
track of a thread-local transaction with awareness of what databases
have been enlisted in the transaction and whether it is being run in
the context of a batch operation.
This is intended to solve the issue of how the content provider can
manage transactions that operate across multiple databases without
risking deadlocks.
Bug 5320369
Change-Id: I08a7d518a3eae1b0bf438402d02f1f1d8e8df7b9
/packages/providers/ContactsProvider/src/com/android/providers/contacts/AbstractContactsProvider.java
|