History log of /frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
e5360fbf3efe85427f7e7f59afe7bbeddb4949ac 01-Nov-2011 Jeff Brown <jeffbrown@google.com> Rewrite SQLite database wrappers.

The main theme of this change is encapsulation. This change
preserves all existing functionality but the implementation
is now much cleaner.

Instead of a "database lock", access to the database is treated
as a resource acquisition problem. If a thread's owns a database
connection, then it can access the database; otherwise, it must
acquire a database connection first, and potentially wait for other
threads to give up theirs. The SQLiteConnectionPool encapsulates
the details of how connections are created, configured, acquired,
released and disposed.

One new feature is that SQLiteConnectionPool can make scheduling
decisions about which thread should next acquire a database
connection when there is contention among threads. The factors
considered include wait queue ordering (fairness among peers),
whether the connection is needed for an interactive operation
(unfairness on behalf of the UI), and whether the primary connection
is needed or if any old connection will do. Thus one goal of the
new SQLiteConnectionPool is to improve the utilization of
database connections.

To emulate some quirks of the old "database lock," we introduce
the concept of the primary database connection. The primary
database connection is the one that is typically used to perform
write operations to the database. When a thread holds the primary
database connection, it effectively prevents other threads from
modifying the database (although they can still read). What's
more, those threads will block when they try to acquire the primary
connection, which provides the same kind of mutual exclusion
features that the old "database lock" had. (In truth, we
probably don't need to be requiring use of the primary database
connection in as many places as we do now, but we can seek to refine
that behavior in future patches.)

Another significant change is that native sqlite3_stmt objects
(prepared statements) are fully encapsulated by the SQLiteConnection
object that owns them. This ensures that the connection can
finalize (destroy) all extant statements that belong to a database
connection when the connection is closed. (In the original code,
this was very complicated because the sqlite3_stmt objects were
managed by SQLiteCompiledSql objects which had different lifetime
from the original SQLiteDatabase that created them. Worse, the
SQLiteCompiledSql finalizer method couldn't actually destroy the
sqlite3_stmt objects because it ran on the finalizer thread and
therefore could not guarantee that it could acquire the database
lock in order to do the work. This resulted in some rather
tortured logic involving a list of pending finalizable statements
and a high change of deadlocks or leaks.)

Because sqlite3_stmt objects never escape the confines of the
SQLiteConnection that owns them, we can also greatly simplify
the design of the SQLiteProgram, SQLiteQuery and SQLiteStatement
objects. They no longer have to wrangle a native sqlite3_stmt
object pointer and manage its lifecycle. So now all they do
is hold bind arguments and provide a fancy API.

All of the JNI glue related to managing database connections
and performing transactions is now bound to SQLiteConnection
(rather than being scattered everywhere). This makes sense because
SQLiteConnection owns the native sqlite3 object, so it is the
only class in the system that can interact with the native
SQLite database directly. Encapsulation for the win.

One particularly tricky part of this change is managing the
ownership of SQLiteConnection objects. At any given time,
a SQLiteConnection is either owned by a SQLiteConnectionPool
or by a SQLiteSession. SQLiteConnections should never be leaked,
but we handle that case too (and yell about it with CloseGuard).

A SQLiteSession object is responsible for acquiring and releasing
a SQLiteConnection object on behalf of a single thread as needed.
For example, the session acquires a connection when a transaction
begins and releases it when finished. If the session cannot
acquire a connection immediately, then the requested operation
blocks until a connection becomes available.

SQLiteSessions are thread-local. A SQLiteDatabase assigns a
distinct session to each thread that performs database operations.
This is very very important. First, it prevents two threads
from trying to use the same SQLiteConnection at the same time
(because two threads can't share the same session).
Second, it prevents a single thread from trying to acquire two
SQLiteConnections simultaneously from the same database (because
a single thread can't have two sessions for the same database which,
in addition to being greedy, could result in a deadlock).

There is strict layering between the various database objects,
objects at lower layers are not aware of objects at higher layers.
Moreover, objects at higher layers generally own objects at lower
layers and are responsible for ensuring they are properly disposed
when no longer needed (good for the environment).

API layer: SQLiteDatabase, SQLiteProgram, SQLiteQuery, SQLiteStatement.
Session layer: SQLiteSession.
Connection layer: SQLiteConnectionPool, SQLiteConnection.
Native layer: JNI glue.

By avoiding cyclic dependencies between layers, we make the
architecture much more intelligible, maintainable and robust.

Finally, this change adds a great deal of new debugging information.
It is now possible to view a list of the most recent database
operations including how long they took to run using
"adb shell dumpsys dbinfo". (Because most of the interesting
work happens in SQLiteConnection, it is easy to add debugging
instrumentation to track all database operations in one place.)

Change-Id: Iffb4ce72d8bcf20b4e087d911da6aa84d2f15297
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
12669b6c8073defcfae369e9f7b6f879b1ac218e 18-Feb-2011 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> bring back sqlite WAL tests now that the feature is in.

Change-Id: I92103915845b7cf3f41f95e909051b6669c63ec4
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
e7dea4ec2479002f5ee15bc6fc98d8c8acd123a6 10-Feb-2011 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> bug:3443154 fix database tests after disabling sqlite wal

sqlite wal is disabled in Change-Id: I283ad26ba7e1793772a372aa8e24df0cb96ce2ef

Change-Id: I2b370c65390a9293e4a82f650c9cee8023b861d7
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
c2ce721fcf684189b7251a5ecbf386426490d68e 06-Oct-2010 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> fix broken build

Change-Id: Ic00e8b98780d48928e05ee27f855e8211fb1ec47
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
790762ca8f4fa458b87f75e7e8cde965c9efe3e5 06-Oct-2010 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> annotate some tests large - just in case they take longer. bug:3066136

Change-Id: I89ab0454f592748f971b678a3ae23724eb6fc2e5
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
b18f27dbf43ee9028a11cafbca23d3fa318e278b 13-Aug-2010 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> Return count of rows in a resultset only once (when startPos = 0)

If a query returns 100 rows and say only 10 rows fit in 1MB, then client
receiving the cursor from the ContentProvider needs to paginate.
ContentProvider returns count of total data everytime it returns a page
(= 1MB) of data to the client.
Returning total count causes reading (and skipping unwanted) data
from sqlite.
Instead, it should be sufficient to get total count once
and re-use the count value during the life of the cursor
until a requery is performed on the cursor.
(Count won't change unless data is changed - in which case
the cursor is asked to perform requery anyway. So doing count
once and reusing it should work)
Change-Id: I3520d94524dda07be9bcff56b6fbae5276af1d3b
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java
65a8883f0e605bb8a73a692987b47ce5da632e72 17-Jul-2010 Vasu Nori <vnori@google.com> don't store mDatabase in SQLiteCursor as it is already in SQLiteQuery

SQLiteCursor has two members: mQuery, mDatabase
but mQuery already has mDatabase.
there is no need for SQLiteCursor.mDatabase.
and everytime SQLiteQuery.mDatabase is to be used, try to use a pooled database
connection handle, if possible.
Change-Id: I42b2376d714a1a4091c843e245a45b882bb7fee6
/frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteCursorTest.java