History log of /external/iproute2/lib/mpls_pton.c
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
4af4471606ccf2b0cb7f5d0711f9be25435d8efc 14-May-2017 David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> ip: add support for more MPLS labels

Kernel now supports up to 30 labels but not defined as part of the uapi.
iproute2 handles up to 8 labels but in a non-consistent way. Update ip
to handle more labels, but in a more programmatic way.

For the MPLS address family, the data field in inet_prefix is used for
labels. Increase that field to 64 u32's -- 64 as nothing more than a
convenient power of 2 number.

Update mpls_pton to take the length of the address field, convert that
length to number of labels and add better error handling to the parsing
of the user supplied string.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
/external/iproute2/lib/mpls_pton.c
dacc5d4197c1f8ac12938a594f7e4131cb937cb2 15-Mar-2015 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> add basic mpls support to iproute

- Pull in the uapi mpls.h
- Update rtnetlink.h to include the mpls rtnetlink notification multicast group.
- Define AF_MPLS in utils.h if it is not defined from elsewhere
as is done with AF_DECnet

The address syntax for multiple mpls labels is a complete invention.
When I looked there seemed to be no wide spread convention for talking
about an mpls label stack in text for. Sometimes people did:
"{ Label1, Label2, Label3 }", sometimes people would do:
"[ label3, label2, label1 ]", and most of the time label
stacks were not explicitly shown at all.

The syntax I wound up using, so it would not have spaces and so it
would visually distinct from other kinds of addresses is.

label1/label2/label3 Where label1 is the label at the top of the label
stack and label3 is the label at the bottom on the label stack.

When there is a single label this matches what seems to be convention
with other tools. Just print out the numeric value of the mpls label.

The netlink protocol for labels uses the on the wire format for a
label stack. The ttl and traffic class are expected to be 0. Using
the on the wire format is common and what happens with other address
types. BGP when passing label stacks also uses this technique with the
exception that the ttl byte is not included making each label in a BGP
label stack 3 bytes instead of 4.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
/external/iproute2/lib/mpls_pton.c