History log of /external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
Revision Date Author Comments (<<< Hide modified files) (Show modified files >>>)
b60e8645ecddb1846cdba52073db394a633841ff 04-Jan-2017 Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com> Scale the result of TightBounds when path was inverse-scaled

When the path was "large" (as defined by ScaleFactor(...)), the computed
bounds would not be adjusted to the correct space. Make sure to scale
the result in those cases.

BUG=chromium:678162

Change-Id: Ia2eb94050c4620286e9abb69976dbc0202ecc307
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/6501
Reviewed-by: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
61c21cdcc31081a1bd4a3a7480b482d135f7df33 05-Oct-2016 caryclark <caryclark@google.com> tight bounds optimization

Add support for tight bounds to detect and return moveTo
followed by close or zero-length lineTo.

Also short circuit so that hard work is avoided when
the path bounds is also the tight bounds.

Avoid doing work if the bounds can be trivially computed.
Include naked moveTo coordinates in the tight bounds.

R=fmalita@chromium.org
BUG=skia:5555, skia:5553
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2394443004

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2394443004
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
385fe4d4b62d7d1dd76116dd570df3290a2f487b 26-Aug-2015 halcanary <halcanary@google.com> Style Change: SkNEW->new; SkDELETE->delete
DOCS_PREVIEW= https://skia.org/?cl=1316123003

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1316123003
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
54359294a7c9dc54802d512a5d891a35c1663392 26-Mar-2015 caryclark <caryclark@google.com> cumulative pathops patch

Replace the implicit curve intersection with a geometric curve intersection. The implicit intersection proved mathematically unstable and took a long time to zero in on an answer.

Use pointers instead of indices to refer to parts of curves. Indices required awkward renumbering.

Unify t and point values so that small intervals can be eliminated in one pass.

Break cubics up front to eliminate loops and cusps.

Make the Simplify and Op code more regular and eliminate arbitrary differences.

Add a builder that takes an array of paths and operators.

Delete unused code.

BUG=skia:3588
R=reed@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1037573004
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
0dc4dd6dda9a7912f696b46d9c02155ec1d1ba5f 24-Mar-2015 reed <reed@google.com> Revert of pathops version two (patchset #16 id:150001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1002693002/)

Reason for revert:
ASAN investigation

Original issue's description:
> pathops version two
>
> R=reed@google.com
>
> marked 'no commit' to attempt to get trybots to run
>
> TBR=reed@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/ccec0f958ffc71a9986d236bc2eb335cb2111119

TBR=caryclark@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1029993002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
ccec0f958ffc71a9986d236bc2eb335cb2111119 24-Mar-2015 caryclark <caryclark@google.com> pathops version two

R=reed@google.com

marked 'no commit' to attempt to get trybots to run

TBR=reed@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1002693002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
406654be7a930b484159f5bca107d3b11d8a9ede 04-Sep-2014 mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup

SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.

This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.

Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.

This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.

On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.

BUG=skia:

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6f

R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
2460bbdfbb1d55ef307c3189c661e65de1a7affb 03-Sep-2014 mtklein <mtklein@google.com> Revert of SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002/)

Reason for revert:
Leaks, leaks, leaks.

Original issue's description:
> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup
>
> SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
> one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
> and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
> instance, not the whole thread pool.
>
> This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
> tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
> quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
> to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
> to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
> places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
> for CPU .skp rendering.
>
> Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
> can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
> to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
> with all other tests now.
>
> This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
> from DM, which we don't use.
>
> On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
> Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
> show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
> minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6f

R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org
TBR=bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, caryclark@google.com, mtklein@chromium.org, reed@google.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:

Author: mtklein@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/533393002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
9c7207b5dc71dc5a96a2eb107d401133333d5b6f 03-Sep-2014 mtklein <mtklein@chromium.org> SkThreadPool ~~> SkTaskGroup

SkTaskGroup is like SkThreadPool except the threads stay in
one global pool. Each SkTaskGroup itself is tiny (4 bytes)
and its wait() method applies only to tasks add()ed to that
instance, not the whole thread pool.

This means we don't need to bring up new thread pools when
tests themselves want to use multithreading (e.g. pathops,
quilt). We just create a new SkTaskGroup and wait for that
to complete. This should be more efficient, and allow us
to expand where we use threads to really latency sensitive
places. E.g. we can probably now use these in nanobench
for CPU .skp rendering.

Now that all threads are sharing the same pool, I think we
can remove most of the custom mechanism pathops tests use
to control threading. They'll just ride on the global pool
with all other tests now.

This (temporarily?) removes the GPU multithreading feature
from DM, which we don't use.

On my desktop, DM runs a little faster (57s -> 55s) in
Debug, and a lot faster in Release (36s -> 24s). The bots
show speedups of similar proportions, cutting more than a
minute off the N4/Release and Win7/Debug runtimes.

BUG=skia:
R=caryclark@google.com, bsalomon@google.com, bungeman@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/531653002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
a8d2ffb1c2e245ae06bdd1c20f34995ab8311cf6 24-Jun-2014 caryclark <caryclark@google.com> add pathops tight bounds; conform path ops' gyp to unit tests

Implement path tight bounds using path ops machinery. This is not
as efficient as it could be; for instance, internally, it creates
a path ops structure more suited to intersection. If this shows
up as a performance bottleneck, it could be improved.

Fix path ops gyp files, which have fallen out of sync with other
tests.

R=mtklein@google.com, bsalomon@google.com
TBR=mtklein
BUG=skia:1712

Author: caryclark@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/348343002
/external/skia/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp