| aa73fb01061351eda46dd6a5f28e874e16d2e500 |
|
02-May-2016 |
Nicholas Sauer <nicksauer@google.com> |
Make CollectionTest and Collection8Test abstract.
These classes are meant to be extended, but the test runner
tries to run them anyway which causes a warning message to
surfaced as a test result. Making them abstract allows
them to be used by subclasses.
bug: 28503384
Change-Id: I45c34dde7f045aa6721352508df463c69c2cd8ef
(cherry picked from commit b30ea05f8b793a5dd781bf45aff6319b0938a299)
|
| b30ea05f8b793a5dd781bf45aff6319b0938a299 |
|
02-May-2016 |
Nicholas Sauer <nicksauer@google.com> |
Make CollectionTest and Collection8Test abstract.
These classes are meant to be extended, but the test runner
tries to run them anyway which causes a warning message to
surfaced as a test result. Making them abstract allows
them to be used by subclasses.
bug: 28503384
Change-Id: I45c34dde7f045aa6721352508df463c69c2cd8ef
|
| 9cb45b2153a3bf3950cd08f0084172ac794819ec |
|
15-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
Fix for CollectionTest not running properly on vogar + missing tests
Made CollectionTest non-public, is shouldn't cause problems
with vogar anymore. Also, CTS currently doesn't find nested tests,
so I've moved some from the LinkedTransferQueueTest to
separate files.
Bug: 27673907
Change-Id: Iee6ecdee3128353f360ead7641cbafcb331f5644
(cherry picked from commit 7fe9db6dc16a8c5f58e1b4657967b71138e1f3ce)
|
| 7fe9db6dc16a8c5f58e1b4657967b71138e1f3ce |
|
15-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
Fix for CollectionTest not running properly on vogar + missing tests
Made CollectionTest non-public, is shouldn't cause problems
with vogar anymore. Also, CTS currently doesn't find nested tests,
so I've moved some from the LinkedTransferQueueTest to
separate files.
Bug: 27673907
Change-Id: Iee6ecdee3128353f360ead7641cbafcb331f5644
|
| e8b323c7cb7d55be9a4df579231e44f04f53d766 |
|
11-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
JSR-166 update without java 1.9 method/classes
Second attempt, in frist one I've submitted some code from openJdk 1.9
that shouldn't be here, orignial change can be found at
5328e07d282bef36ac8b757bbee16a761415b2c4
Adapted from sources taken from CVS using:
cvs -d ':pserver:anonymous@gee.cs.oswego.edu/home/jsr166/jsr166' checkout -D "03/03/2016 10:00:00 GMT" jsr166
This time with hidden/removed "@since 9" methods and classes
Bug: 27426599
Change-Id: Ibd8d26e13cba091bfd983c73d005e4f8d8f5946d
(cherry picked from commit b8b75116273ecfdb8ffdd1869b1c0dd04570a95e)
|
| b8b75116273ecfdb8ffdd1869b1c0dd04570a95e |
|
11-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
JSR-166 update without java 1.9 method/classes
Second attempt, in frist one I've submitted some code from openJdk 1.9
that shouldn't be here, orignial change can be found at
5328e07d282bef36ac8b757bbee16a761415b2c4
Adapted from sources taken from CVS using:
cvs -d ':pserver:anonymous@gee.cs.oswego.edu/home/jsr166/jsr166' checkout -D "03/03/2016 10:00:00 GMT" jsr166
This time with hidden/removed "@since 9" methods and classes
Bug: 27426599
Change-Id: Ibd8d26e13cba091bfd983c73d005e4f8d8f5946d
|
| ed4f365789d43b1961657195df223a19bf4ef20f |
|
15-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
Revert "JSR-166 update"
I missed comments on framework/base change regarding "@since 9" parts
This reverts commit 5328e07d282bef36ac8b757bbee16a761415b2c4.
Change-Id: Iff71b8a17e79a0a5c1ecadc05bccadceabb83393
|
| 5328e07d282bef36ac8b757bbee16a761415b2c4 |
|
11-Mar-2016 |
Przemyslaw Szczepaniak <pszczepaniak@google.com> |
JSR-166 update
Adapted from sources taken from CVS using:
cvs -d ':pserver:anonymous@gee.cs.oswego.edu/home/jsr166/jsr166' checkout -D "03/03/2016 10:00:00 GMT" jsr166
Bug: 27426599
Change-Id: Ic9ba278929f8747d58b69e7d67ec325064588bff
|