| c6ae41e7d469f00d9c92a2b2887c7235d121c009 |
|
11-May-2012 |
Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> |
x86: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx
Since percpu_xxx() serial functions are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx().
Removing percpu_xxx() definition and replacing them by this_cpu_xxx()
in code. There is no function change in this patch, just preparation for
later percpu_xxx serial function removing.
On x86 machine the this_cpu_xxx() serial functions are same as
__this_cpu_xxx() without no unnecessary premmpt enable/disable.
Thanks for Stephen Rothwell, he found and fixed a i386 build error in
the patch.
Also thanks for Andrew Morton, he kept updating the patchset in Linus'
tree.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
| f05e798ad4c09255f590f5b2c00a7ca6c172f983 |
|
28-Mar-2012 |
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
Disintegrate asm/system.h for X86
Disintegrate asm/system.h for X86.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
cc: x86@kernel.org
|
| 1ea0d14e480c245683927eecc03a70faf06e80c8 |
|
03-Sep-2009 |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> |
x86/i386: Make sure stack-protector segment base is cache aligned
The Intel Optimization Reference Guide says:
In Intel Atom microarchitecture, the address generation unit
assumes that the segment base will be 0 by default. Non-zero
segment base will cause load and store operations to experience
a delay.
- If the segment base isn't aligned to a cache line
boundary, the max throughput of memory operations is
reduced to one [e]very 9 cycles.
[...]
Assembly/Compiler Coding Rule 15. (H impact, ML generality)
For Intel Atom processors, use segments with base set to 0
whenever possible; avoid non-zero segment base address that is
not aligned to cache line boundary at all cost.
We can't avoid having a non-zero base for the stack-protector
segment, but we can make it cache-aligned.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4AA01893.6000507@goop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 1e5de18278e6862f4198412b5059a03770fa816a |
|
18-Jul-2009 |
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> |
x86: Introduce GDT_ENTRY_INIT()
GDT_ENTRY_INIT is static initializer of desc_struct.
We already have similar macro GDT_ENTRY() but it's static
initializer for u64 and it cannot be used for desc_struct.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090718151219.GD11294@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 57594742a2b545f8f114cda34f15650be8ae976d |
|
18-Jul-2009 |
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> |
x86: Introduce set_desc_base() and set_desc_limit()
Rename set_base()/set_limit to set_desc_base()/set_desc_limit()
and rewrite them in C. These are naturally introduced by the
idea of get_desc_base()/get_desc_limit().
The conversion actually found the bug in apm_32.c:
bad_bios_desc is written at run-time, but it is defined const
variable.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090718151105.GC11294@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 5c79d2a517a9905599d192db8ce77ab5f1a2faca |
|
11-Feb-2009 |
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs
Impact: fix x86_32 stack protector
Brian Gerst found out that %gs was being initialized to stack_canary
instead of stack_canary - 20, which basically gave the same canary
value for all threads. Fixing this also exposed the following bugs.
* cpu_idle() didn't call boot_init_stack_canary()
* stack canary switching in switch_to() was being done too late making
the initial run of a new thread use the old stack canary value.
Fix all of them and while at it update comment in cpu_idle() about
calling boot_init_stack_canary().
Reported-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 60a5317ff0f42dd313094b88f809f63041568b08 |
|
09-Feb-2009 |
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
x86: implement x86_32 stack protector
Impact: stack protector for x86_32
Implement stack protector for x86_32. GDT entry 28 is used for it.
It's set to point to stack_canary-20 and have the length of 24 bytes.
CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR turns off CONFIG_X86_32_LAZY_GS and sets %gs
to the stack canary segment on entry. As %gs is otherwise unused by
the kernel, the canary can be anywhere. It's defined as a percpu
variable.
x86_32 exception handlers take register frame on stack directly as
struct pt_regs. With -fstack-protector turned on, gcc copies the
whole structure after the stack canary and (of course) doesn't copy
back on return thus losing all changed. For now, -fno-stack-protector
is added to all files which contain those functions. We definitely
need something better.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 76397f72fb9f4c9a96dfe05462887811c81b0e17 |
|
09-Feb-2009 |
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
x86: stackprotector.h misc update
Impact: misc udpate
* wrap content with CONFIG_CC_STACK_PROTECTOR so that other arch files
can include it directly
* add missing includes
This will help future changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| 947e76cdc34c782fc947313d4331380686eebbad |
|
18-Jan-2009 |
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> |
x86: move stack_canary into irq_stack
Impact: x86_64 percpu area layout change, irq_stack now at the beginning
Now that the PDA is empty except for the stack canary, it can be removed.
The irqstack is moved to the start of the per-cpu section. If the stack
protector is enabled, the canary overlaps the bottom 48 bytes of the irqstack.
tj: * updated subject
* dropped asm relocation of irq_stack_ptr
* updated comments a bit
* rebased on top of stack canary changes
Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
| c6e50f93db5bd0895ec7c7d1b6f3886c6e1f11b6 |
|
19-Jan-2009 |
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
x86: cleanup stack protector
Impact: cleanup
Make the following cleanups.
* remove duplicate comment from boot_init_stack_canary() which fits
better in the other place - cpu_idle().
* move stack_canary offset check from __switch_to() to
boot_init_stack_canary().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|