Cross Reference: /drivers/acpi/pci

History log of /drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
Revision	Date	Author	Comments
10f6dc7eede9a8895626e9c1b4f2c3b75fbf2850	10-Nov-2011	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>	PCI: Rework ASPM disable code Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features - including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless the platform has granted us that control. This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS. The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the BIOS state. It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do - there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone. Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
3c076351c4027a56d5005a39a0b518a4ba393ce2	10-Nov-2011	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>	PCI: Rework ASPM disable code Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features - including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless the platform has granted us that control. This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS. The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the BIOS state. It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do - there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone. Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
e545b55a1e980cbb6a158886286106bbf39722b1	20-Jun-2011	Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>	ACPI: fix 80 char overflow Trivial fix for 80 char line overflow in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
a246670ddee3132fa71f8993d3989ad8ac04d965	30-Apr-2011	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	PCI/ACPI: Report _OSC control mask returned on failure to get control If an attempt to get _OSC control of the PCIe native features from the BIOS fails, report the resulting mask of control flags the BIOS was willing to grant in the error message. Moreover, if the _OSC support mask is insufficient for requesting control of the PCIe native features or pcie_ports_disabled is set, print a diagnostic message containing the _OSC support mask. This helps to diagnose obscure _OSC-related problems on a number machines. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
eca67315e0e0d5fd91264d79c88694006dbc7d31	21-Mar-2011	Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>	PCI: Disable ASPM when _OSC control is not granted for PCIe services v3 -> v2: Added text to describe the problem v2 -> v1: Split this patch from v1 v1 : Part of: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130042212003242&w=2 Disable ASPM when no _OSC control for PCIe services is granted by the BIOS. This is to protect systems with a buggy BIOS that did not set the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit even though the underlying HW can't do ASPM. To turn "on" ASPM the minimum the BIOS needs to do: 1. Clear the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit. 2. Support _OSC appropriately There is no _OSC Control bit for ASPM. However, we expect the BIOS to support _OSC for a Root Bridge that originates a PCIe hierarchy. If this is not the case - we are better off not enabling ASPM on that server. Commit 852972acff8f10f3a15679be2059bb94916cba5d (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the Platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) describes the above scenario. To quote verbatim from there: [The PCI SIG documentation for the _OSC OS/firmware handshaking interface states: "If the _OSC control method is absent from the scope of a host bridge device, then the operating system must not enable or attempt to use any features defined in this section for the hierarchy originated by the host bridge." The obvious interpretation of this is that the OS should not attempt to use PCIe hotplug, PME or AER - however, the specification also notes that an _OSC method is required for PCIe hierarchies, and experimental validation with An Alternative OS indicates that it doesn't use any PCIe functionality if the _OSC method is missing. That arguably means we shouldn't be using MSI or extended config space, but right now our problems seem to be limited to vendors being surprised when ASPM gets enabled on machines when other OSs refuse to do so. So, for now, let's just disable ASPM if the _OSC method doesn't exist or refuses to hand over PCIe capability control.] Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
8b8bae901ce23addbdcdb54fa1696fb2d049feb5	05-Mar-2011	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	PCI/ACPI: Report ASPM support to BIOS if not disabled from command line We need to distinguish the situation in which ASPM support is disabled from the command line or through .config from the situation in which it is disabled, because the hardware or BIOS can't handle it. In the former case we should not report ASPM support to the BIOS through ACPI _OSC, but in the latter case we should do that. Introduce pcie_aspm_support_enabled() that can be used by acpi_pci_root_add() to determine whether or not it should report ASPM support to the BIOS through _OSC. Cc: stable@kernel.org References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29722 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232 Reported-and-tested-by: Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
d3072e6a7e9bf7aca200370317f8e297be360b17	16-Jan-2011	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI: Fix boot problem related to APEI with acpi_disabled set Commit 415e12b23792 ("PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control once for each root bridge (v3)") put the acpi_hest_init() call in acpi_pci_root_init() into a wrong place, presumably because the author confused acpi_pci_disabled with acpi_disabled. Bring the code ordering in acpi_pci_root_init() back to sanity. Additionally, make sure that hest_disable is set when acpi_disabled is set, which is going to prevent acpi_hest_parse(), that still may be executed for acpi_disabled=1 through aer_acpi_firmware_first(), from crashing because of uninitialized hest_tab. Reported-and-tested-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
415e12b2379239973feab91850b0dce985c6058a	07-Jan-2011	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control once for each root bridge (v3) Move the evaluation of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() (to request control of PCI Express native features) into acpi_pci_root_add() to avoid calling it many times for the same root complex with the same arguments. Additionally, check if all of the requisite _OSC support bits are set before calling acpi_pci_osc_control_set() for a given root complex. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232 Reported-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Tested-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
03e7c3432d40d067476eaf49ede29128b637998f	08-Oct-2010	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>	ACPI: remove unused declaration of proc_fs.h Remove unused declaration of proc_fs.h. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
28eb5f274a305bf3a13b2c80c4804d4515d05c64	21-Aug-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	PCI: PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once After commit 852972acff8f10f3a15679be2059bb94916cba5d (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) control of the PCIe Capability Structure is unconditionally requested by acpi_pci_root_add(), which in principle may cause problems to happen in two ways. First, the BIOS may refuse to give control of the PCIe Capability Structure if it is not asked for any of the _OSC features depending on it at the same time. Second, the BIOS may assume that control of the _OSC features depending on the PCIe Capability Structure will be requested in the future and may behave incorrectly if that doesn't happen. For this reason, control of the PCIe Capability Structure should always be requested along with control of any other _OSC features that may depend on it (ie. PCIe native PME, PCIe native hot-plug, PCIe AER). Rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks which native PCIe port services can be enabled, according to the BIOS, and (2) it requests control of all these services simultaneously. In particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to fail if the BIOS refuses to grant control of the PCIe Capability Structure, which means that no native PCIe port services can be enabled for the PCIe Root Complex the given port belongs to. If that happens, ASPM is disabled to avoid problems with mishandling it by the part of the PCIe hierarchy for which control of the PCIe Capability Structure has not been received. Make it possible to override this behavior using 'pcie_ports=native' (use the PCIe native services regardless of the BIOS response to the control request), or 'pcie_ports=compat' (do not use the PCIe native services at all). Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that they don't request control of the services directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
75fb60f26befb59dbfa05cb122972642b7bdd219	23-Aug-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI/PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them It is possible that the BIOS will not grant control of all _OSC features requested via acpi_pci_osc_control_set(), so it is recommended to negotiate the final set of _OSC features with the query flag set before calling _OSC to request control of these features. To implement it, rework acpi_pci_osc_control_set() so that the caller can specify the mask of _OSC control bits to negotiate and the mask of _OSC control bits that are absolutely necessary to it. Then, acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will run _OSC queries in a loop until the mask of _OSC control bits returned by the BIOS is equal to the mask passed to it. Also, before running the _OSC request acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will check if the caller's required control bits are present in the final mask. Using this mechanism we will be able to avoid situations in which the BIOS doesn't grant control of certain _OSC features, because they depend on some other _OSC features that have not been requested. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2b8fd9186d9275b07aef43e5bb4e98cd571f9a7d	23-Aug-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI/PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query There is the assumption in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() that it is always sufficient to compare the mask of _OSC control bits to be requested with the result of an _OSC query where all of the known control bits have been checked. However, in general, that need not be the case. For example, if an _OSC feature A depends on an _OSC feature B and control of A, B plus another _OSC feature C is requested simultaneously, the BIOS may return A, B, C, while it would only return C if A and C were requested without B. That may result in passing a wrong mask of _OSC control bits to an _OSC control request, in which case the BIOS may only grant control of a subset of the requested features. Moreover, acpi_pci_run_osc() will return error code if that happens and the caller of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will not know that it's been granted control of some _OSC features. Consequently, the system will generally not work as expected. Apart from this acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always uses the mask of _OSC control bits returned by the very first invocation of acpi_pci_query_osc(), but that is done with the second argument equal to OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT which generally happens to affect the returned _OSC control bits. For these reasons, make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always check if control of the requested _OSC features will be granted before making the final control request. As a result, the osc_control_qry and osc_queried members of struct acpi_pci_root are not necessary any more, so drop them and remove the remaining code referring to them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
ab8e8957a2ae21c0f036476c6db13e949be730ac	21-Aug-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI/PCI: Make acpi_pci_query_osc() return control bits Make acpi_pci_query_osc() use an additional pointer argument to return the mask of control bits obtained from the BIOS to the caller. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
b879dc4b3e81069e3f715b7569bb0f43eed76c76	21-Aug-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI/PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() attempt to find the handle of the _OSC object under the given PCI root bridge object after verifying that its second argument is correct and that there is a struct acpi_pci_root object for the given root bridge handle, which is more logical than the old code. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
852972acff8f10f3a15679be2059bb94916cba5d	22-Jun-2010	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>	ACPI: Disable ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe The PCI SIG documentation for the _OSC OS/firmware handshaking interface states: "If the _OSC control method is absent from the scope of a host bridge device, then the operating system must not enable or attempt to use any features defined in this section for the hierarchy originated by the host bridge." The obvious interpretation of this is that the OS should not attempt to use PCIe hotplug, PME or AER - however, the specification also notes that an _OSC method is required for PCIe hierarchies, and experimental validation with An Alternative OS indicates that it doesn't use any PCIe functionality if the _OSC method is missing. That arguably means we shouldn't be using MSI or extended config space, but right now our problems seem to be limited to vendors being surprised when ASPM gets enabled on machines when other OSs refuse to do so. So, for now, let's just disable ASPM if the _OSC method doesn't exist or refuses to hand over PCIe capability control. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
57283776b2b821ba4d592f61cad04d0293412740	11-Mar-2010	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: pass acpi_pci_root to arch-specific scan The acpi_pci_root structure contains all the individual items (acpi_device, domain, bus number) we pass to pci_acpi_scan_root(), so just pass the single acpi_pci_root pointer directly. This will make it easier to add _CBA support later. For _CBA, we need the entire downstream bus range, not just the base bus number. We have that in the acpi_pci_root structure, so passing the pointer makes it available to the arch-specific code. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
6ad95513d60096b569e4e4bd721420f03b57e4d4	11-Mar-2010	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: save downstream bus range Previously, we only saved the root bus number, i.e., the beginning of the downstream bus range. We now support IORESOURCE_BUS resources, so this patch uses that to keep track of both the beginning and the end of the downstream bus range. It's important to know both the beginning and the end for supporting _CBA (see PCI Firmware spec, rev 3.0, sec 4.1.3) and so we know the limits for any possible PCI bus renumbering (we can't renumber downstream buses to be outside the bus number range claimed by the host bridge). It's clear from the spec that the bus range is supposed to be in _CRS, but if we don't find it there, we'll assume [_BBN - 0xFF] or [0 - 0xFF]. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
5a0e3ad6af8660be21ca98a971cd00f331318c05	24-Mar-2010	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
7bc5e3f2be32ae6fb0c74cd0f707f986b3a01a26	23-Feb-2010	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	x86/PCI: use host bridge _CRS info by default on 2008 and newer machines The main benefit of using ACPI host bridge window information is that we can do better resource allocation in systems with multiple host bridges, e.g., http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14183 Sometimes we need _CRS information even if we only have one host bridge, e.g., https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341681 Most of these systems are relatively new, so this patch turns on "pci=use_crs" only on machines with a BIOS date of 2008 or newer. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
b67ea76172d4b1922c4b3c46c8ea8e9fec1ff38c	17-Feb-2010	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
c97adf9e7bebf17a86b95e2131bf9ba76c4857c7	10-Jan-2010	Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>	acpi: make ACPI device id constant The ids field of the struct acpi_driver is constant in <linux/acpi/acpi_bus.h> so it is worth to make the initialization data also constant. The semantic match that finds this kind of pattern is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @r@ disable decl_init,const_decl_init; identifier I1, I2, x; @@ struct I1 { ... const struct I2 *x; ... }; @s@ identifier r.I1, y; identifier r.x, E; @@ struct I1 y = { .x = E, }; @c@ identifier r.I2; identifier s.E; @@ const struct I2 E[] = ... ; @depends on !c@ identifier r.I2; identifier s.E; @@ + const struct I2 E[] = ...; // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: cocci@diku.dk Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
3a9622dc4659af44a8098a233f65c51e495ff0a5	29-Oct-2009	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>	ACPI: cleanup pci_root _OSC code. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
497fb54f578efd2b479727bc88d5ef942c0a1e2d	13-Oct-2009	Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>	ACPI / PCI: Fix NULL pointer dereference in acpi_get_pci_dev() (rev. 2) acpi_get_pci_dev() may be called for a non-PCI device, in which case it should return NULL. However, it assumes that every handle it finds in the ACPI CA name space, between given device handle and the PCI root bridge handle, corresponds to a PCI-to-PCI bridge with an existing secondary bus. For this reason, when it finds a struct pci_dev object corresponding to one of them, it doesn't check if its 'subordinate' field is a valid pointer. This obviously leads to a NULL pointer dereference if acpi_get_pci_dev() is called for a non-PCI device with a PCI parent which is not a bridge. To fix this issue make acpi_get_pci_dev() check if pdev->subordinate is not NULL for every device it finds on the path between the root bridge and the device it's supposed to get to and return NULL if the "target" device cannot be found. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129 (worked in 2.6.30, regression in 2.6.31) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reported-by: Danny Feng <dfeng@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Tested-by: chepioq <chepioq@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
76d56de57ae60c6be383e48e7068fd973d5fb08a	24-Jul-2009	Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: export acpi_pci_root and friends We can simplify ACPI drivers if we can tell whether a handle is an ACPI PCI root or not. Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
a192a9580bcc41692be1f36b77c3b681827f566a	28-Jul-2009	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>	ACPI: Move definition of PREFIX from acpi_bus.h to internal..h Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
412af97838828bc6d035a1902c8974f944663da6	26-Jun-2009	Troy Moure <twmoure@szypr.net>	ACPI: video: prevent NULL deref in acpi_get_pci_dev() ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/857228/focus=857468 When the ACPI video driver initializes, it does a namespace walk looking for for supported devices. When we find an appropriate handle, we walk up the ACPI tree looking for a PCI root bus, and then walk back down the PCI bus, assuming that every device inbetween is a P2P bridge. This assumption is not correct, and is reported broken on at least: Dell Latitude E6400 ThinkPad X61 Dell XPS M1330 Add a NULL deref check to prevent boot panics. Reported-by: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Troy Moure <twmoure@szypr.net> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
0705495d9010048e293013d9d129cf723363a0a8	18-Jun-2009	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: remove unused dev/fn information We never use the PCI device & function number, so remove it to make it clear that it's not needed. Many PCI host bridges don't even appear in config space, so it's meaningless to look at stuff from _ADR, which doesn't exist in that case. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
c1aec8341627dad5d63cc24aa6746dc077f5b706	18-Jun-2009	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: simplify list traversals Using list_for_each_entry() makes traversing the root list easier. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
caf420c68afe01acd7c458ce40b85b3db5330ff5	18-Jun-2009	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: use driver data rather than list lookup There's no need to search the list to find the acpi_pci_root structure. We saved it as device->driver_data when we added the device. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
f5eebbe119a861b5e4f5c67c886eab0937c686ed	18-Jun-2009	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: simplify acpi_pci_root_add() control flow By looking up the segment & bus number earlier, we don't have to worry about cleaning up if it fails. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
fbe2b31b4b6dfa790cbc88e00631f3112c4fc54e	18-Jun-2009	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>	ACPI: pci_root: check _CRS, then _BBN for downstream bus number To find a host bridge's downstream bus number, we currently look at _BBN first. If _BBN returns a bus number we've already seen, we conclude that _BBN was wrong and look for a bus number in _CRS. However, the spec[1] (figure 5-5 and the example in sec 9.12.1) and an ACPI FAQ[2] suggest that the OS should use _CRS to discover the bus number range, and that _BBN is really intended to bootstrap _CRS methods that reference PCI opregions. This patch makes us always look at _CRS first. If _CRS doesn't supply a bus number, we look at _BBN. If _BBN doesn't exist, we default to zero. This makes the behavior consistent regardless of device discovery order. Previously, if A and B had duplicate _BBNs and we found A first, we'd only look at B's _CRS, whereas if we found B first, we'd only look at A's _CRS. I'm told that Windows discovers host bridge bus numbers using _CRS, so it should be fairly safe to rely on this BIOS functionality. This patch also removes two misleading messages: we printed the "Wrong _BBN value, reboot and use option 'pci=noacpi'" message before looking at _CRS, so we would likely find the bus number in _CRS, the system would work fine, and the user would be confused. The "PCI _CRS %d overrides _BBN 0" message incorrectly assumes _BBN was zero, and it's useless anyway because we print the segment/bus number a few lines later. References: [1] http://www.acpi.info/DOWNLOADS/ACPIspec30b.pdf [2] http://www.acpi.info/acpi_faq.htm _BBN/_CRS discussion http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/f/98f3fe47-dfc3-4e74-92a3-088782200fe7/TWAR05005_WinHEC05.ppt (slide 17) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1662 ASUS PR-DLS http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 ASUS PR-DLSW http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 ASUS PR-DLS533 Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> CC: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> CC: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
859a3f86ca83346f4097e956d0b27d96aa7a1cff	10-Jun-2009	Alexander Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() API A PCI domain cannot change as you descend down subordinate buses, which makes the 'segment' argument to acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() useless. Change the interface to take a struct pci_bus *, from whence we can derive the bus number and segment. Reducing the number of arguments makes life simpler for callers. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
499650de6906722184b639989b47227a362b62f8	10-Jun-2009	Alexander Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: eviscerate pci_bind.c Now that we can dynamically convert an ACPI CA handle to a struct pci_dev at runtime, there's no need to statically bind them during boot. acpi_pci_bind/unbind are vastly simplified, and are only used to evaluate _PRT methods on P2P bridges and non-bridge children. This patch also changes the time-space tradeoff ever so slightly. Looking up the ACPI-PCI binding is never in the performance path, and by eliminating this caching, we save 24 bytes for each _ADR device in the ACPI namespace. This patch lays further groundwork to eventually eliminate the acpi_driver_ops.bind callback. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2f7bbceb5b6aa938024bb4dad93c410fa59ed3b9	10-Jun-2009	Alexander Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: Introduce acpi_get_pci_dev() Convert an ACPI CA handle to a struct pci_dev. Performing this lookup dynamically allows us to get rid of the ACPI-PCI binding code, which: - eliminates struct acpi_device vs struct pci_dev lifetime issues - lays more groundwork for eliminating .start from acpi_device_ops and thus simplifying ACPI drivers - whacks out a lot of code This change lays the groundwork for eliminating much of pci_bind.c. Although pci_root.c may not be the most logical place for this change, putting it here saves us from having to export acpi_pci_find_root. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
275582031f9b3597a1b973f3ff617adfe639faa2	10-Jun-2009	Alexander Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: Introduce acpi_is_root_bridge() Returns whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge or not. This API is generically useful, and shouldn't just be a hotplug function. The implementation becomes much simpler as well. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
ce597bb42aa84bc73db80509b7c37e7fbc0b75c4	10-Jun-2009	Alexander Chiang <achiang@hp.com>	ACPI: make acpi_pci_bind() static acpi_pci_root_add() explicitly assigns device->ops.bind, and later calls acpi_pci_bind_root(), which also does the same thing. We don't need to repeat ourselves; removing the explicit assignment allows us to make acpi_pci_bind() static. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
9f5404d8ea90bfa4d58a3936e5a3d0d28cecf60f	09-Feb-2009	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>	PCI/ACPI: rename pci_osc_control_set() - Rename pci_osc_control_set() to acpi_pci_osc_control_set() according to the other API names in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c. - Move _OSC related definitions to include/linux/acpi.h because _OSC related API is implemented in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c now. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
63f10f0f6df4e4e860b790d64bebfde85b540b0a	09-Feb-2009	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>	PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c Move PCI _OSC management code from drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c to drivers/acpi/pci_root.c. The benefits are - We no longer need struct osc_data and its management code (contents are moved to struct acpi_pci_root). This simplify the code, and we no longer care about kmalloc() failure. - We can make pci_acpi_osc_support() be a static function, which is called only from drivers/acpi/pci_root.c. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Acked-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
07ae95f988a34465bdcb384bfa73c03424fe2312	10-Nov-2008	Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com>	ACPI/PCI: PCI MSI _OSC support capabilities called when root bridge added The _OSC capability OSC_MSI_SUPPORT is set when the root bridge is added with pci_acpi_osc_support(), so we no longer need to do it in the PCI MSI driver. Also adds the function pci_msi_enabled, which returns true if pci=nomsi is not on the kernel command-line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
3e1b16002af29758b6bc9c38939d43838d9335bc	10-Nov-2008	Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com>	ACPI/PCI: PCIe ASPM _OSC support capabilities called when root bridge added The _OSC capabilities OSC_ACTIVE_STATE_PWR_SUPPORT and OSC_CLOCK_PWR_CAPABILITY_SUPPORT are set when the root bridge is added with pci_acpi_osc_support(), so we no longer need to do it in the ASPM driver. Also add the function pcie_aspm_enabled, which returns true if pcie_aspm=off is not on the kernel command-line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>