2d06d8c49afdcc9bb35a85039fa50f0fe35bd40e |
|
27-Mar-2011 |
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> |
[CPUFREQ] use dynamic debug instead of custom infrastructure With dynamic debug having gained the capability to report debug messages also during the boot process, it offers a far superior interface for debug messages than the custom cpufreq infrastructure. As a first step, remove the old cpufreq_debug_printk() function and replace it with a call to the generic pr_debug() function. How can dynamic debug be used on cpufreq? You need a kernel which has CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG enabled. To enabled debugging during runtime, mount debugfs and $ echo -n 'module cpufreq +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control for debugging the complete "cpufreq" module. To achieve the same goal during boot, append ddebug_query="module cpufreq +p" as a boot parameter to the kernel of your choice. For more detailled instructions, please see Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|
c4d14bc0bb5d13e316890651ae4518b764c3344c |
|
20-Sep-2008 |
Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net> |
[CPUFREQ] Don't export governors for default governor We don't need to export the governors for use as the default governor, because the default governor will be built-in anyway and we can access the symbol directly. This also fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c:578:25: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_gov_conservative' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:582:25: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_gov_ondemand' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c:39:25: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_gov_performance' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_powersave.c:38:25: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_gov_powersave' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c:190:25: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_gov_userspace' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|
e08f5f5bb5dfaaa28d69ffe37eb774533297657f |
|
26-Oct-2006 |
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> |
[CPUFREQ] Fix coding style issues in cpufreq. Clean up cpufreq subsystem to fix coding style issues and to improve the readability. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|
32ee8c3e470d86588b51dc42ed01e85c5fa0f180 |
|
28-Feb-2006 |
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> |
[CPUFREQ] Lots of whitespace & CodingStyle cleanup. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 |
|
17-Apr-2005 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> |
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
|